i've wondered about this for a while. how is the fly-by-wire system better than low-tech cables? seems like there are so many more possible points of failure .doesn't seem like enough reward for the risk. not that anything could be done about it at this point. cables have been used forever and have always been extremely reliable. why re-invent the wheel?![]()
Hey, if it's broke, don't fix it! ;-)I beleive all (except RS and RSS) Spyder Can Am's from 2013 on will be fly by wire with throttle bodies. They are here to stay. This includes the new ST and the ST limited.
The 2010s had this problem. Crack the throttle slightly on the second try, if it doesn't start right up on the first go.My RT has always been hard to re-start. It's fine when cold, or when it's really warmed up, but in between - like riding two miles to the Post Office - it requires two to three attempts to start it. Hasn't failed to start tho.
Anyone who has tried to get back home after breaking a throttle cable on a trip, or out in the woods or desert, will argue about cable reliability. All cables break, and have to be lubed regularly. They don't like dirt or water, either. Mechanical/electrical cruise controls are frought with problems. FBW has disadvantages, but it has great advantages, too. Unless you are going to chuck fuel injection and go back to carburetors, chuck electronic ignition and go back to points and condensor, and generally go stone-age on the rest of the machine, the FBW throttle makes good sense. JMHO
The 2010s had this problem. Crack the throttle slightly on the second try, if it doesn't start right up on the first go.