Advantages/Disadvantages of Auto or manual Transmissions?

[MuGGzy]

I am considering buying an RS-S with the Auto/Paddle shifting system and Reverse but as all my experience to date has been with traditional manual shifting clutch systems I am a little nervous about going to this Auto transmission.

Are there any known issues or problems that pop up with one more often than the other? Anything to watch out for if I test drive one with an Auto?

 

[SpyderFun]

.....Anything to watch out for if I test drive one with an Auto?

Yes.....having too much fun! Keep the throttle on while shifting and you will see how easy and smooth it is....




-Mike
<Sent using Tapatalk>

 

[Derek Paisley]

The only problem (if you can considerate it a problem) is that there is no clutch.
While moving, you are always in gear.

I have a 2012 RSS SE5 and love it!

 

[JaymeG33]

While riding last summer with other fellow GS/RS owners, the automatics seemed to run hotter on the temp gauge than the manuals. We couldn't contribute it to any other factors. There were 3 manuals & 2 autos in our group & both automatics ran much hotter, at least 2 bars higher on the gauge.

 

[spydaman60]

it's all a matter of personal preference! I wouldn't be without the sm5!nojoke just love the feeling of dropping it and popping it!:cheers:

 

[Storm56]

I am new to Spyders and the forum. I rode both and felt much more comfortable with the manual, of course I have been riding motorcycles over 40 years and do not plan on getting rid of my regular rides just yet. Feel it will be much easier and more natural when switching back and forth between rides. Of course I prefer a manual shuttle over HST on my tractors too, beginning to sense a pattern here...

 

[Storm56]

While riding last summer with other fellow GS/RS owners, the automatics seemed to run hotter on the temp gauge than the manuals. We couldn't contribute it to any other factors. There were 3 manuals & 2 autos in our group & both automatics ran much hotter, at least 2 bars higher on the gauge.

Good to read that as I have some concerns over the heat issue, hope it is the case!

 

[ARtraveler]

About the only main difference I see is you will save $1,500 or so if you go with a SM5.

I have owned four :spyder2:,s. The first came with the SM5 because that is all that was available. The next three were all SE5's.

Did not miss the manual shifting. I have only had one glitch with the SE5 in 50,000 plus miles. The shift linkage disconnected on my 2010 RT.

The way I drive, (conservative, no burn outs, average 5 mph over posted on highways), I did not notice any performance issues, or mileage issues.

The SE5 is actually fun once you get used to it. Don't miss the SM5 here at all.

 

[daveinva]

Learned on a SM5, bought an SE5. Love love love the SE5, it's part of what makes a Spyder a Spyder. :thumbup:

On two wheels, I like having the clutch because there are countless times where it comes in handy to slip the clutch in low-speed maneuvers. On three wheels-- where slow speed maneuvers don't risk dropping the Spyder-- there's no need for that kind of finesse.

And, as a practical matter, the SE5 shifts *faster* than the SM5, and it doesn't hurt performance, i.e. the advantages you'd see on an MT versus AT with a *car* for example aren't there on the Spyder. If the SM5 was faster or sipped less fuel then it'd be a debate, but as the wise man above just said, the only advantage is that it's cheaper on Day One.

For the record, I much prefer having a manual transmission on a car than an auto, am partial to having the manual clutch on a bike (although scooters can be fun), but on the Spyder, the SE5 is just a joy to use, and lets me focus completely on the ride (one less hand to cramp, one less foot to fumble with, etc., etc.).

 

[MidLifeCrisis]

SEs cost more to maintain are more complicated and more reports of various failures. Not a high rate of failures anymore, but something to think about.

Slowing down in turns is different. SEs shift quick, so they grab real quick if your trying to simulate gently slowing around corners. That takes a bit of getting used to.

They don't cost as well, if the engine kills either. My kill switch went bad and everything went dead in the middle if a turn through a busy intersection. I pulled in the clutch and rolled through. I know the SEs clutches disengage in certain RPMs too, but I personally prefer having control in emergencies. Can't beet the relaxation of an SE though in traffic.

 

[Jeriatric]

Have the SE 5 and am very happy with it(great to tour with). Also ride a two wheeler and have had zero issues transitioning.

It's just another choice you get to make and a buck or two you can spend, or save. In the end you'll be happy with your choice. And that's what counts. :thumbup:

 

[Bob Denman]

The clutches in the SE 5 trannys don't fully lock up until you get them up to about 4000 rpm... If you loaf along with the clutches slipping; you'll burn them. :shocked:
The SM 5 trannys don't have this setup, so it's not an issue with them...

But I sure do love my ESSIE!

 

[DynamoBT]

Love my SM5!! I feel more involved in the overall action of the machine. Like to drive a stick in a car too. Makes me more "in" the process. Tried the SE5 once at a demo at low speeds and did not like it. Felt the Spyder was "driving me" not me it. I suppose I would get used to it. You just have to try both and see which you like.

 

[daveinva]

SEs cost more to maintain

:hun:

The only "extra" cost is ensuring my oil is topped off... :dontknow:

 

[DrewNJ]

We've come to find around here that the SM is simpler, and more forgiving to changes such as pipes, air filters and tuners. The SE is more complex, can be finicky with oil level and electronics, and doesn't always play nice with the same setups that work well on the SM machines.
The SE is easier to ride for sure and takes less thought. The SM is more old school.

Personally, I'm a fan of the SM as I grew up on 2 wheels shifting gears. It just feels right to me. My wife would be more comfortable on the SE. But it's really a personal choice. One really isn't significantly better or worse than the other.....

 

[BikerDoc]

While riding last summer with other fellow GS/RS owners, the automatics seemed to run hotter on the temp gauge than the manuals. We couldn't contribute it to any other factors. There were 3 manuals & 2 autos in our group & both automatics ran much hotter, at least 2 bars higher on the gauge.

I have owned both the manual & the seemi auto and experienced no difference in run temps

 

[asp125]

Not having an SE I can't comment. But what is the failsafe mode if say your throttle gets stuck wide open? Not like there's a clutch to pull in, is there? How do you find neutral instantly before you run into something? If you hit the kill switch does the rear tire instantly lock up?

 

[Jeriatric]

Not having an SE I can't comment. But what is the failsafe mode if say your throttle gets stuck wide open? Not like there's a clutch to pull in, is there? How do you find neutral instantly before you run into something? If you hit the kill switch does the rear tire instantly lock up?

The engine STOP switch. BRP even suggests it be used to stop the engine before turning the key off. It's a good habit to get into, and may, save your bacon.

 

[asp125]

The engine STOP switch. BRP even suggests it be used to stop the engine before turning the key off. It's a good habit to get into, and may, save your bacon.

Good to know. I have that habit from my two wheeled machines.

 

[MidLifeCrisis]

:hun:

The only "extra" cost is ensuring my oil is topped off... :dontknow:

I was referring to the filter and additional labor charges at oil changes and any other adjustment or calibration requirements.