♪♫♪♫:ani29::2excited::roflblack::bdh:Okay, you're going on ignore. roflmao
.
♪♫♪♫:ani29::2excited::roflblack::bdh:Okay, you're going on ignore. roflmao
.
Well... I'm offended by people who are offended by country music. Including my wife, in who's presence I am forbidden from listening to it. :lecturef_smilie: (But I still love her.)And yes, I'm offended by country music. :gaah:
lol
if someone frequently posts things that bother or offend you, just put them on your ignore list. problem solved. :thumbup:
:agree: Frankly, I have difficulty understanding why this whole issue is not simply as easy as that. :dontknow:
I have to admit that I do not read every post, or every thread, but I read a lot of them in the past 12 months or so, and I just haven't seen the degree of offensiveness here that has so many members upset? Either I'm missing something, or perhaps I'm part of the problem. :sour:
I see. Thanks, Joe. I like the fact that Lamont gives folks here the flexibility to remove/edit their posts. But what you just described is the "downside" to that. It is, in fact, one reason that many forums do not allow such flexibility with posts after they've been on the board a specific number of minutes. (So as to discourage the ability to make offensive posts, then delete them so the poster won't get "reported".) Frankly, I'm not sure which forum methodology makes more sense. Folks will disagree on that point.sometimes things that are very rude or hateful get posted, then after 2 or 3 people read it, the original writer will delete it before anyone else see's it.
Cruzr Joe
I see. Thanks, Joe. I like the fact that Lamont gives folks here the flexibility to remove/edit their posts. But what you just described is the "downside" to that. It is, in fact, one reason that many forums do not allow such flexibility with posts after they've been on the board a specific number of minutes. (So as to discourage the ability to make offensive posts, then delete them so the poster won't get "reported".) Frankly, I'm not sure which forum methodology makes more sense. Folks will disagree on that point.
When Lamont gave members here complete control over their own posts, he trusted everyone to post responsibly. If what you describe is happening frequently, then that's a real shame, and perhaps the policy should be changed. If, OTOH, it happens very infrequently, then it may be best for everyone just to ignore the rude flame throwers and just move on.
But people are not likely to "quote" offensive posts. Just like in this thread, they vaguely refer to them, saying "that poster" was out of line, etc., etc. What that sometimes does is degrade a situation even further as unclear posts often lead to misunderstandings, on everybody's part.Not saying this is an answer, but typically, if you quote the post, and the original post is deleted, the quoted post remains containing what has been possibly deleted.
PK
But if I put Denman on my ignore list, my screen would go BLANK!!!!![]()
Well... I'm offended by people who are offended by country music. Including my wife, in who's presence I am forbidden from listening to it. :lecturef_smilie: (But I still love her.)
If it ain't country, it ain't music!
sometimes things that are very rude or hateful get posted, then after 2 or 3 people read it, the original writer will delete it before anyone else see's it.
Cruzr Joe
So far I've kept out of this discussion for a couple of reasons:
First...I am after all a "foreigner" and thus I always try to behave like a guest should when in someone else's house.