• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Whos NOT upgrading to 2014 ?

I would be a fool if I traded the only Spyder ever built that actually increases in value every year (08 PE). :coffee:


I see your still holding out on that one. I guess I have to admit being duped by all that Premier Edition rah rah stuff. It does not seem to be working on my RT-S #474. (Cloaking button on).

I have a genuine 2010 RT-S Premier Edition that will be traded off. I am willing to sell it for only $45,000 to the first person with cash. Don't wait, its a premier edition. :roflblack::roflblack:
 
I strongly considered the '14 RTS and even talked to Len about a trade. But being a new model year, I'm going to wait at least a year to see how it goes. I love my '11 red RTS and there's nothing wrong with it. The bigger engine would be fine, but a shaft drive would really make me jump.
 
I had a chance to test ride one at the Motorcycle show yesterday in Long Beach, and this is an unquestionable step up. It is just a smoother ride with far more power.

I can't jump in to a 2014, especially with only a year and half on my (purchased used) 2010 RT and a house eating up my accounts, but I'll certainly make the upgrade within a few years.

If the insides are as improved as the ride, then they have a real winner on their hands, and I think we'll see far fewer disappointed RT owners in the coming years.
 
Reply

Staying put. I prefer the 990 compared to the puller motor in the '14 (no offense intended- to each his own)
Not a ruuning board guy either. Do like the '14 clutch concept. Have never felt the need for a 6th gear tho.
Really like the new maintenance schedule and hope BRP gets enough data to further tweek the pre '14's maintenance schedule.

Love my 2011 and have far to much invested (time, money, & blood) to abandon it. Except for the one issue most everyone is aware of. I could not be happier.

Saw I got a private message from you but can't figure out how to open it.
 
1330 and 6 speed

Is the new 1330 motor and 6 speed only going to be in the RT line? So all the cheaper models still get the 998 motor and 5 speed?
 
Is the new 1330 motor and 6 speed only going to be in the RT line? So all the cheaper models still get the 998 motor and 5 speed?

That is correct for the moment. :thumbup: If it turns out to be a great powerplant, I see that being changed in future years.
 
The long haired Col and I have put almost 7000 miles on our 2013 RTS and are prepping for some spyderpop upgrades over the winter. Although it is always nice to have the newest version it can also be the one with the most problems. We have been lucky and have not had any issues with ours and plan to drive it like a rental until we are ready to upgrade. ;)
 
Just bought will stay

I am staying with the 2013 RTS-SE5 I just bought in September. I got a great deal $21,300 and it is running just fine.

Just finished the last mod - well almost the last - still plan to put some led's on the mirrors.

The 2014 has some nice features - I had a Victory Vision Tour with a huge motor that was happy at 2200 RPM all day and with a sixth gear that netted me 40-45 mpg.

From that experience I think the bigger engine and torque more on the lower end along with the 6th gear is nice but not a big enough incentive to move up.

The rest of the changes such as tank capacity and electric clutch are nice-to-haves as well but not the 'killer updates' to make a change. I now get 27-30 mpg and my Spyder has the same legs as most of my Harley Buddies so nothing lost there.

I already have the '2014 suspension' as I upgraded my 2013 with 2014 springs and shocks as some of you may have seen in my other post(s).

The 2014 is a very nice step in evolution but not 'revolutionary' as the changes were from the 2012 era to the 2013. The 2014 is a great machine looks like and if I were back level I might consider it.

Satisfied enough right now.
 
If I trade up it may be a 2015. My '10 runs great and it is set up perfect with fox shocks and Ron's sway bar along with a few other mods. After Lamont done the Lazer alignment I couldn't be more satisified with it. Oh, by the way, I may jump on one when they do Blue again.
 
Last edited:
Not upgrading

I am quite happy with my pure magnesium 2013 ST-S.....want to put a lot more milage on her and get farkles, farkles, and just run the heck out of her, no problems with this one so far :pray:....:clap:love It :thumbup:, and just getting started.
 
If I trade up it may be a 2015. My '10 runs great and it is set up perfect with fox shocks and Ron's sway bar along with a few other mods. After Lamont done the Lazer alignment I couldn't be more satisified with it. Oh, by the way, I may jump on one when they do Blue again.

I'm with you StanProff. My '10 RT-S is all set up with shocks, RonBar, backrest and extra lights and I'm having alignment done at Spyderfest. Plus bought a Jeep GC last fall so have pay for that to be able upgrade to the 1330 ACE and SE6. All bugs should be worked out by then along more new farkles will be available.


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
 
I've got my 2012 RS just the way I want it. At just over 2,000 miles (all last summer) it is still a baby. Here's hoping for years of awesome ground pounding ahead of us.:doorag:bike.jpg
 
I posted a week ago thinking about trading up to a 2014 RT. I have a 2012 RT and I have modified it to suit me! I like a lot of the changes in the new RT but the responses to my post made me think twice (and more!). My bike is paid for, looks great and is still under warranty so I decided to add a 3 year BEST warranty and ride on! I may reconsider next year but I'll have a lot more information about the changes made and how well they work in the real world by then!
 
:clap: You got it where you want it- Its paid for- You are adding a 3 Year Best warranty which WILL help resale value if you decide to trade down the road!

I think you made a smart decision you will be happy with!!
 
I'm wondering how much of a hit people are taking for trading in a bike that is only a year or two old?

Seems like a bad financial decision unless you just have disposable income. :dontknow:
 
I looked at going up to a 2014, test rode one and even had permission from the boss to guy one if I wanted. But I decided to stay with my 2011. I have it set up the way I like and don't have any problems with it. Maybe I'll relook at things in a couple of years. Maybe...
 
I'm wondering how much of a hit people are taking for trading in a bike that is only a year or two old?

Seems like a bad financial decision unless you just have disposable income. :dontknow:

Buying one to begin with has to be from disposable income, no?


Sent from my Venue 8 3830 using Tapatalk
 
Buying one to begin with has to be from disposable income, no?


Sent from my Venue 8 3830 using Tapatalk


Well, I guess sorta. I worked hard to get a decent deal, but I can't afford to take a $2000-$3000 ...or more, hit 12-24 months later on it.
 
Back
Top