ARtraveler
R.I.P. Dwayne
I just received my copy of January "Motorcycle Consumer News". There is an article on model comparisons of trikes. Reviewed were factory H-D, and custom Gold Wing Trikes. The magazine wanted to test a Can-Am RT in this mix but did not get a good response from Can-Am.
Quoting from the magazine: "At first, Can-Am flat out told us "no" because company officials felt that the RT "isn't really a trike and doesn't really compare with the other vehicles" we were going to test. Then they said they'd get back to us. Follow-up calls to Can-Am's media relations office were met with no response, so we moved on"
IN MY OPINION, Can-Am blew a great chance to get some good ink for their product. This magazine is known for its accurate and unbiased opinions of motorcycles. They do not accept advertising, so they are not beholden to the companies whose products they review. Price wise and feature wise, the RT definately would not have come in on the bottom.
I am very surprised at the no response from Can-Am concerning the test. Unfortunately, sometimes we tend to hear that same theme when it comes to customers dealing with the company concerning issues.
I know that there will be some that will suggest that they would be comparing apples and oranges due to wheel configuration--but I think that would have been a good thing--as all three vehicles are for a special market (upline prices, upline features, touring configuration on three wheels, allowing seniors to continue riding, etc.). The article was definately on the money in their comments and reviews of both the H-D and the Goldwing. It will be interesting to hear what some of you have to say about this.
opcorn:
Quoting from the magazine: "At first, Can-Am flat out told us "no" because company officials felt that the RT "isn't really a trike and doesn't really compare with the other vehicles" we were going to test. Then they said they'd get back to us. Follow-up calls to Can-Am's media relations office were met with no response, so we moved on"
IN MY OPINION, Can-Am blew a great chance to get some good ink for their product. This magazine is known for its accurate and unbiased opinions of motorcycles. They do not accept advertising, so they are not beholden to the companies whose products they review. Price wise and feature wise, the RT definately would not have come in on the bottom.
I am very surprised at the no response from Can-Am concerning the test. Unfortunately, sometimes we tend to hear that same theme when it comes to customers dealing with the company concerning issues.
I know that there will be some that will suggest that they would be comparing apples and oranges due to wheel configuration--but I think that would have been a good thing--as all three vehicles are for a special market (upline prices, upline features, touring configuration on three wheels, allowing seniors to continue riding, etc.). The article was definately on the money in their comments and reviews of both the H-D and the Goldwing. It will be interesting to hear what some of you have to say about this.

Last edited: