• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Has anyone removed/modified the Airbox on an F3 to improve intake airflow? Ideas?

Cobranut

Well-known member
I did a search, but didn't see anything similar.

Has anyone removed the huge airbox on the F3S and installed a duct and conical filter to increase filter area and get cooler air into the throttle body?

I notice my IAT often runs 10 degrees hotter than ambient air, and getting that huge bulky box out of the way when servicing would be nice as well.
 
The airbox on my 22 F3S draws outside air from the left side and the hole for the incoming air is larger than the duct to the throttle body so I can't see an after market anything that would improve that. I am not aware of any after market air intakes for your machine. FWIW ;)
 
The airbox on my 22 F3S draws outside air from the left side and the hole for the incoming air is larger than the duct to the throttle body so I can't see an after market anything that would improve that. I am not aware of any after market air intakes for your machine. FWIW ;)
Thanks,

Just thinking of the small filter area, as well as making servicing much easier in the future.
I'll probably install a K&N filter at the least, and I may see if I can fabricate a duct to direct fresh air from outside the bodywork to the inlet.
I does seem to suffer from a bit of heat soak in hot weather.
 
While I know it would take a dyno to confirm this, I am not sure that an intake modification would not afford some worthy performance improvement. Especially if coupled with other upgrades like less restrictive exhaust and ECU flash.

As you can see in Picture-1 below. The inlet path is not huge. Nor will the final airbox inlet (located top left corner) feed the 3 intake manifolds evenly. Cylinder 2 and 3 are left with a longer, and most likely, depleted volume path. This after incoming air has traveled through the filter, filter box, and adaptive tubing (Picture 2). All of which will tend to increase heat soak and volume density. Not to mention, making servicing of spark plugs, fuel injectors, and coil packs more difficult.

Now making a system that is compatible with the sensors, ECU, etc, that's going to be a challenge.

Spyder Intake 1.jpg

Spyder Intake 2.jpg
 
True, there's all that ^^, but if I was a betting man, I reckon that if asked, the ROTAX Designers/Engineers would say that the size/volume of the intake tract & ducting is all there for a reason; and in fact, it carries out some essential purpose, probably something along the lines of 'providing sufficient volume of air to allow the engine to draw on that large volume of air whenever the rider (suddenly?) increases throttle demand, in order to avoid engine hesitation or something similar; but in reality, it's probably more likely to make it possible for the engine to pass/exceed some emission level or noise/decibel limit... :cautious:

Just Sayin' ;)
 
Back
Top