• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

No discussions on oil lately. So maybe time!!!

Since XPS only rates their 5W40 up to 104 F, I went with 10W50 for my Ryker.
112 F forecast for Las Vegas Valley this week (124 F in Death Valley)
 
The guy is saying not good to go up in viscosity on cold number. BRP recommends 5w40. Many here are using 10w40. So are we ruining our engines?
 
The guy is saying not good to go up in viscosity on cold number. BRP recommends 5w40. Many here are using 10w40. So are we ruining our engines?

That is generally good advice for very cold weather areas. For hot areas, the concern is the upper number.
 
The guy is saying not good to go up in viscosity on cold number. BRP recommends 5w40. Many here are using 10w40. So are we ruining our engines?

BRP recommends what they have.

Originally, the 998 Rotax was built for the Aprilia - Recommended Lubricant: 20w-50 Oil.
Aprilia.jpg

BRP modified this engine to get more torque, sacrificing HP, for the Spyder. Recommended Lubricant: 10w-40 Oil.

BRP consolidated their lubricants, several years later, from many to just a few. These remaining lubricants have to cover everything from a snowmobile, which may sit overnight (or longer) in sub-zero temperatures. To side-by-sides, our Spyder/Ryker's, watercraft, etc. You need a very low, cold start viscosity number (0w or 5w) for a snowmobile. But you need a high number (40 or 50) for an off road vehicle or our Spyders running in much hotter temperatures.

Another factor is, the wider the spread between the low number and the high number. The less stable the lubricant is. So, you really want the narrowest spread that will get the job done for your application. Because your Spyder/Ryker probably does not need to be started with an oil temperature in the sub-zero range. You really don't need a 5w oil. This is why a 10w or 15w-40 oil is actually a much better fit for the Spyder/Ryker than the BRP lubricants. A full synthetic 10w oil will get you down to a zero degree cold start. Most of our Spyder/Ryker's never see cold start temperatures anywhere near this cold.

Some people tell me they ride their Spyder/Ryker in sub-zero temperatures. But this has no bearing on what oil viscosity is needed. It's the cold start temperature of your machine (Oil) that is critical. Once the engine is running, it doesn't really care what the ambient air temperature is.

For someone running much of the time in 90 degree to triple digit temperatures. A 20w-50 weight oil is not a bad idea. You'll loose some fuel mileage. But it will be minimal. And engine protection is more important.

Lubricants have come a long way in the last few decades. We now have 'One Size Fits Many' products. But you can still get better service if you more closely match your needs to a lubricant that best fits the conditions.
 
Last edited:
"Another factor is, the wider the spread between the low number and the high number." Prior to the demise of Mechanix Illustrated, Ron's comment was addressed in one of the latter issues. Recommended use of oils (at that time) with a range greater than 10W30 was discouraged. Reason being was that the modern additives in oils increasing their high and low applications, built up over time in the piston ring groves decreasing the function of the rings. Exactly what those additives were and if they're still being used today, I don't know.
 
I read Bob is The Oil Guy forum all the time and a number of oil tests of Rotella T6 synthetic 5W-40 in motorcycles showed that it sheared quickly at 2K or less. I have that in my F3T now but don't intend to run it longer than 2K miles. I think a number of folks run the T6 in their Can Am's and wonder if any have had the oil tested at 5K or higher?

I did read one detailed report from a car guru who noted that oil tended to shear down to upper 20, low 30 range quickly but then evened out for the next umpteen thousand miles. Maybe that's the case with motorcycles, but inclined to think that our wet clutch transmissions cause most of the shearing.

Anyway, I plan on going with 10-40 Amsoil my next change.
 
+1
I'm also switching to 10W40 Amsoil soonest. I had planned on the switch from Rotella BEFORE I read this thread.

Lew L
 
Rotella T6 5W-40. Shell has removed all mention of being suitable for motorcycles. From both the jugs and online literature. But the specs still say meets JASO MA/MA2.

Rotella T6 0W-40. Shell has never listed it for motorcycles and does not have the JASO clutch slippage spec listed at all.

That is what they have done in Canada at least.
 
Another factor is, the wider the spread between the low number and the high number. The less stable the lubricant is. So, you really want the narrowest spread that will get the job done for your application.

That was a valid concern in the 1970s with 10W40, but as you stated at the close of your post, "Lubricants have come a long way in the last few decades."
10W60 (specified by MG) Motoul worked very well in my Moto Guzi in temps up to 116F.
 
When was the last time anyone here had an oil related engine failure on anything they own?

Not sure you meant it as a question or an actual statement, but, modern "major brand" oils are for the most part so good i don't think oil related failure enters into the picture.
 
I'd really like to see an oil analysis of Amsoil/M1 10w40 or Castrol 10w50 after a BRP stated 9000 mile run time. Has anybody ran their oil for 9k miles?
 
Everything BajaRon said.
I currently have Motul 7100 10w40 in my 19.
I will be switching to the 300V 15w50 in the spring.
Looking at specs, it barely nudges into the 50 weight range, and with the heavier base oil, should maintain viscosity well over the change interval, shearing into a 40 weight range and staying for a while.
My 12 had a lot of different oils in it, (I experiment) but the stand-out used oil analysis was on generic, black bottle Havoline 20w50 conventional. At 4000 miles in, it was still testing at a 20w40, with some shear present, and very low Fe numbers (iron) that tracks higher with mileage. The VTwin shears oil, and 40 weights (usually) drain as 20 weight oil at 4000 miles.
 
Not sure you meant it as a question or an actual statement, but, modern "major brand" oils are for the most part so good i don't think oil related failure enters into the picture.

There is a spectrum between 'Failure' and 'Optimal'. I think this is where a discussion on lubricants is valuable.

Oils have improved because engines have improved. And vise-versa. Machined tolerances in today's engines are much smaller. Plus, the energy output per cubic inch has increased a great deal. Internal pressures and temperatures are much higher than in days gone by. Modern engines would not be able to function for very long without the current improvements in lubricants matching the the requirements.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top