I am an animal lover ...... However United Airlines is required by law to hire STUPID PEOPLE .... I think throwing that flight attendant to a pack of wolves might be appropriate, but laying the blame on the company the has to hire Idiots isn't fair ........... lay the blame where it belongs .....jmho ..... Mike :thumbup:
Then maybe should have identified this Thread you started with " United Airlines steps up " :dontknow:................ Mike :thumbup:Maybe it was poor training. But, since you want to take this to a different direction, what law are you referring to?
It looks like United took full responsibility. That was a smart move on their part, so as not to look like a bad company by throwing an employee to the wolves.
:agree: .... there was a lot of screw-ups on this , but news article said the owner was not Proficient in English :lecturef_smilie:, I'm not saying they are off the hook, but there were extenuating circumstances ....... Mike :thumbup:However, is there no responsibility here for the owner to question or refuse the obvious nonsensical order to stow the dog in the overhead? Just the thought of this incident makes me so angry I could just.............well, I'll leave it at that.
:shocked::shocked::shocked::shocked::shocked::shocked::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead::banghead:
However, is there no responsibility here for the owner to question or refuse the obvious nonsensical order to stow the dog in the overhead?
Then maybe should have identified this Thread you started with " United Airlines steps up " :dontknow:................ Mike :thumbup:
Yup: The lawyers are gonna make a KILLING with this case... :banghead:
This should easily go for the policy limits, and you can "stick a fork" in that Flight Attendant: she's done!
Those bins are dark, noisy, and the airflow is pretty close to nil...
While they're not airtight: the lack of unrestricted airflow is what killed that puppy..
The more scared it got: the faster it's heart beat... needing even MORE oxygen.