• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Confused About Rear Car Tires Options

The Arachnid tire

Is anyone using the Vee Rubber VTR-350 Arachnid tire? It's marketed as specifically designed for the Spyder. I am most interested in mileage and a symmetrical design across the tire. No rain use.

https://www.bikebandit.com/tires-tu...MIjdqHzcjV2QIVCnd-Ch3G6Q2TEAYYASABEgK5BvD_BwE
98% of the people on this Forum have said it was no better than the Kenda and usually worse. They are a Clone of the Kenda , so it's also much weaker than any Car tire........Also tires that were designed and produced years ago, can't compete with the newer designs of today .....Mike :thumbup:
 
I did some research on this awhile back and tire sizes were an issue ...... plus from what I learned I wouldn't get them no matter the sizing issue...... Mike :thumbup:

Hi Mike
What did you learn that you didn't like about runflats on a Spyder (or possibly any vehicle)?
 
RUN-FLAT TIRES

Hi Mike
What did you learn that you didn't like about runflats on a Spyder (or possibly any vehicle)?
:banghead: ...... Sorry I did that research a couple of years ago and I just can't remember the details ...... but I do remember that they don't come in our sizes and they are UBER expensive ........ Mike :thumbup:
 
I have an 2017 F-3 Ltd that’ll need a back tire soon. I like the looks of the Altimax, but I wonder whether it’ll fit. The clearance between the mud flap and the OEM Kendra 225/50-15 is exactly one inch. The 215/60-15 Altimax, being taller, reduces that clearance to just over 3/8”. That’s pretty tight. Has anybody tried that Altimax on this exact model Spyder?
 
Where did my previous reply to this thread go?

I had a reply to this thread a few days ago about my new rear tire being Yokohama S Drive and it just disappeared. So did the specific reply to it. Just wondered where it went?
 
I had a reply to this thread a few days ago about my new rear tire being Yokohama S Drive and it just disappeared. So did the specific reply to it. Just wondered where it went?
That was on a different thread, about a Michelin tire, started by BLUEKNIGHT911. Yup, that thread is now gone... I don't know what happened to it.
 
I have an 2017 F-3 Ltd that’ll need a back tire soon. I like the looks of the Altimax, but I wonder whether it’ll fit. The clearance between the mud flap and the OEM Kendra 225/50-15 is exactly one inch. The 215/60-15 Altimax, being taller, reduces that clearance to just over 3/8”. That’s pretty tight. Has anybody tried that Altimax on this exact model Spyder?

We have the Altimax on our 2016 F3L. 215/60/15 fits fine. 8,500 miles so far.
 
Thanks

I’ve noticed a lot of the tire replacement discussion addresses traction issues. I think the tread pattern on the Altimax tire might shed water better than the Kumho because it has more channels, but I was concerned about mudflap clearance. I appreciate reassurance from somebody with firsthand experience. Thanks.
 
We have had trouble on the RT with clearance on bikes that came in with the 215-60-15 General, and others. Its one of the reasons we standardized on and stock the Yoko 205/55/15 as its an exact match so no clearance issues.
 
MISSING TIRE THREAD

That was on a different thread, about a Michelin tire, started by BLUEKNIGHT911. Yup, that thread is now gone... I don't know what happened to it.
I started that Thread and removed it because like a lot of Threads on this Forum it became a discussion about something else..........IMHO if people want to discuss something else maybe they should start another TREAD !!!!! .................Mike :thumbup:
 
Based on the recommendation of PitBull Powersports and reading many positive online reviews, I'm going for the Kumho Ecsta AST for the rear of my F3. Bonus...it's symmetrical across the tread :)
 
Last edited:
Based on the recommendation of PitBull Powersports and reading many positive online reviews, I'm going for the Kumho Ecsta AST for the rear of my F3. Bonus...it's symmetrical across the tread :)

If you want to do burn outs, it does break loose easier but its also not very good in the rain. We have replaced a number of those for these two reasons alone.
 
Ridden 70 miles on the new combo of continental contact pro up front and Yokohama S drive rear. I have to say it is a night and day difference in that little amount of time. Not too mention the Baja Ron bar. Made the machine the way it always should have been! Thanks for the feedback on the other post!
 
I DO ride in the rain, and I've never had a lick of trouble with the Kumho Ecsta AST... :thumbup:

Yeah, same here with my Kuhmo Ecsta KU22, Bob. No trouble in either wet or dry.......and when you look up car reviews, out of 10 reviews, there was no mention of them not being good in wet or dry, so I don’t know what the difference is as far as what JC is seeing. Maybe tyre pressures on the Spyder? I run 20psi rear.

Pete
 
:agree: That's true, I still run Kumho's (@ 20psi & even lower!) for their great balance between traction and longevity on our 'fairly hard on tires' Aussie roads, BUT, I realise that they are a compromise tire (& I'd like to think I've conveyed that to others too!) They definitely ARE NOT 'the greatest' when it comes to traction if you compare them with some of the 'ultimate traction tires' available, but at the correct pressure for the load & your ryding style & demands, they are certainly Waaaaayyyyy better than the Kendas in any condition, wet or dry!! And yet they give their 'significantly improved over Kenda' traction AND they give us significantly better tire longevity!! Maybe they are not the greatest tires available for long lasting wear either, but they do that pretty well AND they also give us this significantly better than Kenda traction - well really, there's no 'maybe' about it - there ARE other tires that will wear/last significantly longer, but they generally achieve that by providing appalling traction regardless of the pressure you run them at!! And yes, like i said earlier, there ARE other tires out there that provide better traction, but they generally do that at some cost to longevity, especially on our hot, long, and relatively coarse Aussie road surfaces!! :shocked:

So, for my own Spyder & ryding, I chose (& recommend for ryders with similar loads & requirements to me) the Kumhos as a tire that provides a pretty good balance between long tire wear/life AND pretty reasonable traction throughout that life IF you run them at the right pressures for your load & ryding style/needs! I & others have also made suggestions as to what that pressure might be & I've even explained how to arrive at it, but it's up to you to make some effort on your own behalf to do that! However, back to Kumhos, at the right pressure for the load on them, they work pretty damn well, much better than the Kendas, in BOTH ASPECTS - tire life & traction! But I will agree that if you want traction & couldn't give a fig about how long the tire lasts, the Kumhos aren't going to be high on your list! And if you want tire life but don't really care too much about traction on both wet and dry road surfaces, there are probably better choices than the Kumho out there for you as well!! There will be tires that excel in providing traction on dry roads, but they often do that at the cost of piss poor traction on the mildest of damp roads and abysmal tire life! Similarly, there are tires that provide astounding levels of grip on the wettest of roads, but they generally scrub out before your eyes the moment the road dries out, and even on wet roads, they rarely have a great life expectancy! But if you are prepared to put in a little effort working out what the correct pressure for YOU & your load & ryding style/needs is and you want a tire that works pretty well on both wet and dry roads if not pretty much all conditions as well as giving a reasonable tire life while doing all that, then you could do a lot worse than choosing a Kumho! But I bet you won't find too many that work just as well in all conditions and still give you a reasonable tire life! :thumbup:

Running at close to the right pressures, Kumhos are a pretty reasonable all rounder. There ARE other tires out there that others may have recommended that do this equally as well, Kumhos aren't alone in producing good 'compromise' tires; there might even be tires that suit YOU and your loads & ryding style & needs better in SOME conditions, or there might be others that are less sensitive to pressure requirements, altho they'd certainly work better again if they did get run at the optimum pressure for them; and if you know that you NEVER drive on even just a damp road, there have been a couple of tires that've been recommended here &/or in this thread that will do that well - but they generally don't provide that level of grip on dry roads &/or last as long on a mix of roads & conditions. Yeah, there are also tires that work better in the wet too - but they generally don't provide that level of grip on dry roads AND achieve a reasonable tire life, nor do they usually do so well when subjected to a mix of roads & conditions either! And like I mentioned above, there are even other pretty reasonably well suited to the broad range of potential conditions with a reasonable tire life tires available as well.

So, by now you must be aware that there are a few people here who have recommended tires that do work pretty well across the range of conditions most of you are likely to meet; some have qualified their recommendations as being particularly good re traction on dry roads; some just on traction wet or dry regardless of tire life; some on tire life &/or cost; some have made recommendations regardless of what pressure you run them at; some qualify their recommendations on you making an effort to work out and run the correct pressure for your load &/or ryding style/needs; some of us even recommend tires based on better tire life and all round traction on a variety or a specific type of road surface; but the THINGS linking ALL these recommendations together is that invariably, they are Passenger/car tires and that they are WAAAAY BETTER than the OE Kendas across the board in terms of ride, handling, grip, and tire life, even if that may require dropping your chosen tire pressure a little or a lottle! ;)

And you, the reader of all this, get to take any info you may have gleaned from it all away & do with it as you will, YOU are the only one who knows exactly what you want to feel in your ryde & how you want your tires to behave, and it's a vast subject, altho I would like to think that this may have helped some get a better handle on it all, even if just a little! Enjoy! :thumbup:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top