It won't happen during the lifetime of anyone here today, well except maybe those under 30, but when the population of this country reaches the area of about one billion people in 50 to 100 years from now popular sentiment will change. The 2nd amendment will be repealed, or at least amended to allow only hunting and competition firearms which must be stored in a gun club safe. No more home storage.
Where a state issues an actual CCW, it makes sense to honor it nationwide. What I read, however, is that if a state allows CCW without issuing any permit, the law would require reciprocity on that, too. I object to that part because it would create an enforcement nightmare for the police. If I'm a cop and stop somebody who is carrying but has no physical CCW permit or is at least in some database I could look up, how do I know if he is really authorized in his home state or not? I'd have to know the laws of all 50 states. That seems like a needless burden on the police. Simple solution - require reciprocity only if the carrier can produce a physical permit - states not currently requiring a CCW permit could easily issue a courtesy authorization for their citizens to carry with them when out of state.
It won't happen during the lifetime of anyone here today, well except maybe those under 30, but when the population of this country reaches the area of about one billion people in 50 to 100 years from now popular sentiment will change. The 2nd amendment will be repealed, or at least amended to allow only hunting and competition firearms which must be stored in a gun club safe. No more home storage.
I read that Alaska has no CCW permit needed to carry in the state, but to travel to other states you have to obtain the state CCW permit. I think that is required from other states with in state carry.
Most private party transfers are between individuals who know one another.
Ordering guns online... that's just a myth. :lecturef_smilie:
You'll still need to have your background checked out.
Really? But not the anti-gun arguments, I suppose. :hun:
For starters, most are not "anti-gun" but PRO effective gun regulations
Simply due to the fact that most media is anti-gun, you will see few if any occurrences where a gun was used to stop or prevent a crime.
Absolute and total BS.
What I stated is accepted and proven many times over. Believe as you wish. Thank you NRA.
I love certain people, they believe that I say it so that means it's true.
Believe it or not: HIPPA regulations are the culprit... :gaah:
Allow Law Enforcement Agencies the opportunity to look into a person's mental health history, and you'll catch an awful lot of the problems! :thumbup:
Absolute and total BS.
In my area, all the media outlets jump all over any story where that happens.
And I watch FOX a lot. How do you explain THEM not reporting same ??
NO, never mind.
This "I've got my mind made up, don't confuse me with facts" gets old really quickly.