Sensible gun control

[Bob Denman]

:clap: :agree: :roflblack::roflblack::roflblack: :2thumbs:

 

[vided]

Why insult poor harry mudd :roflblack::roflblack::roflblack::yikes::yikes::yikes:

 

[Bob Denman]

:shocked: I don't think that he's going to mind: he died over 30 years ago. ray:


http://m.imdb.com/name/nm0138354/bio

 

[Bob Denman]

This News just in:

 

[Wildrice]

This is a completely BS point.

No matter how many guns are present, the first one to shoot has a HUGE advantage.
And the terrorist won't stand out if his gun is visible.
And the general public is not known for good marksmanship......so the extra lead flying around might actually be MORE dangerous.
The assassin expects to die in the process.

Listen, I don't like to "debate" stuff like this in a forum with an entirely different purpose but...............
If you are going to debate and try to draw an intelligent conclusion, you need to consider ALL of the factors, not just the emotional ones.

The difference between a fine upstanding law abiding citizen with a gun and a criminal with a gun is: about 3 seconds.

The more handguns in circulation, the more gun deaths there will be; and most of them will NOT be actual criminals.
Most will be friends, family members and children.

Calling it gun "control" is itself biased toward an emotional response. It should be referred to as "gun restrictions".

We require a drivers license for a car, whose purpose is not to kill things.
Then there are guns, whose main purpose IS to kill things but no license required at all.

If you support removing all restrictions from owning guns, then you support a large increase in accidental gun deaths.
That is a fact, whether you like it or not.

And finally.........where do you think that "criminals" GET the guns that they have ??
The overwhelming answer is: From a person who initially bought it legally.

I have quite a few guns--located in various rooms through the house--never needed to use them. I also carry a spare tire--no flats in last 3 decades. I have a CCW--rarely carry but on occasion I do. I do have the Judge in my center console load with double 00 buck shot. They give me a sense of security--don't know my reaction when needed. I do know Chicago has one of the strongest gun laws & it's not working. Currently there are approx 350 million firearms in the USA--that more firearms than people. Most bad guys steal their guns or buy on the black market I do know the only thing that can stop a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.
The ones that worry me most are the law abiding people that buy a firearm for protection & never fire it. That could have an ugly ending. I know one gal who's son bought her a 357 magnum very lightweight revolver. She's in for a big surprise the 1st time she fires it. she's had it for 3 yrs & never went to the shooting range. Using smartphones while driving kill more people than guns times x. It's the land of the free because of the brave. Now cars & trucks are being used for mass assaults. I sincerely believe that those will firearm skills are a benefit to society--it doesn't eliminate the treat but it does increase the odds of a better outcome. E-5 Feit US Army

 

[Bob Denman]

:agree: about 147% :2thumbs:
Firearms ownership is a right.................:yes::clap:


.



........:lecturef_smilie: That carries with it: a tremendous responsibility! :shocked:

The gunowners of America owe EVERY other citizen a promise of perception, discretion, caution, compassion, and proficiency! nojoke
Or they shouldn't own them... :thumbup:

 

[ES44AC]

I also carry a spare mag.
What about his cuffs made you think he wasn't law enforcement, the fur lining? :roflblack:

I carry a G26 Gen 4 Glock with a 12 rnd and a 17 rnd mag in my pocket at all times and a couple more G17 mags in my go bag. I'd rather have it and never use it than not have it and need it.

I put about 500 rnds for practice every year minimum. This doesn't count my AR15'S, they are just plain fun :yes:

 

[Wildrice]

You are laboring under a misconception that I'll be happy to dispel for you...

This is not a democracy, and you have no First Amendment rights in here. This is Lamont's sandbox, and we're here only because we follow HIS rules. nojoke
we enjoy good humor, technical information, bad humor, stories about rides and events, questionable humor, reviews of the latest farkles, tasteless humor yikes, some news, discussions about various ways to improve our bikes, and the occassional bit of mildly adult humor.
:lecturef_smilie: We don't like arguments!
Of course they happen: it's unfortunate, and we try to work things out amongst ourselves.
But we NEVER try to start a thread for the sole purpose of starting a ruckus.
Anyone who starts trying to "upset the applecart" in here, will have their threads and/or postings reported to the Moderator.
(I'm sure that he keeps track of who is posting the most stuff that upsets the masses.)

So keep trying to get under our collective skins, and I'm sure that you'll find out what can happen.

I knew I was in big trouble when you put that mask on--The Lone Stranger ???

 

[Bob Denman]

I knew I was in big trouble when you put that mask on--The Lone Stranger ???

Just Stein: Frank N...

 

[CrashDavis]

sensible gun control might be selling guns to those with a license and harsh punishment for those who buy them illegally or don't have a license. no different then what having a car should be.

Regardless of which state you are in there is already harsh punishment on the books for buying guns illegally. Federal law prohibits trying to buy a gun when you've been told you can't (following due process, of course). A lot of people are stopped from buying each year because they are on a no-buy list. The problem is the feds have decided not to prosecute.

 

[Bob Denman]

Regardless of which state you are in there is already harsh punishment on the books for buying guns illegally. Federal law prohibits trying to buy a gun when you've been told you can't (following due process, of course). A lot of people are stopped from buying each year because they are on a no-buy list. The problem is the feds have decided not to prosecute.

And I have to agree with the rules on this one! :thumbup: