That seems to be a bad choice.
I wonder why ?
Geez Edith !............I kept thinking there would be 1330 version of an ST. oh well.
Well, I guess once my 2009 GS is worn out( still runs and looks great), I'll be out of the Spyder scene.
I am a "mid- controls" guy, I like to hug my bike, move around when going into turns.....
I like to stand up if I feel like it, I like to use my legs as shock absorbers sometimes.....
So unless they come out with some way of having those controls, I'll be gone.
Funny, they build the F3, tell ya it's for limited 2-up riding, put a rear shock on it that can't handle 2 stout people, and now the choices dwindle....
I understand their logic, just don't agree with it.
Bill Pitman
:shocked: Did any of you 8actually believe that you could stuff the 1330 under the RS/ST bodywork? :dontknow:
It was never going to happens, and the result was inevitable.
The 1330 is the engine platform for the future: the 998 was a stop-gap from the past...
Patti, and everyone else in Spyderland .......The F3 ...is the new RS ........Think about it, why would BRP keep a 6 year old body style AND then put the new 1330 engine into it. It doesn't make economic sense..........jmho.......Mike :thumbup:Well, so much for my idea of a 10th Anniversary RS model! :gaah:
I understand about the issue of supporting two engines, etc., but it's sad when long-time Spyder RS riders feel like they'll have to abandon the product all together. Maybe they'll eventually come out with something like a F3-CR (crotch rocket) with controls further back!