Honda has the funding, the engineers, and the know-how.
If they decided to pull the trigger on a reverse trike project; there'd be a real shake-up... :shocked:
When a rule is perceived as acceptable to be applied to a group of bikes, but is considered unacceptable (taboo) when applied to another bike is......please help, can't find that two words term...
When a rule is perceived as acceptable to be applied to a group of bikes, but is considered unacceptable (taboo) when applied to another bike is......please help, can't find that two words term...
When a rule is perceived as acceptable to be applied to a group of bikes, but is considered unacceptable (taboo) when applied to another bike is......please help, can't find that two words term...
Somehow I can't see HD bundling up all the electronic wizardry that makes a reverse trike safe and not an accident waiting to happen.
Now if Honda ever decided to do it ......
Maybe I'm missing something but could you name another modern reverse trike that doesn't have an electronic VSS system?
Buy yourself a fish sandwich if you can. Those Chinese knock-offs don't count.
Yes you do need electronic wizardry to mass market a reverse trike configuration.
Without the Bosch VSS there would be more of these puppies flipped into the boonies than you could count.
Ever wonder why no one (okay, I know there were a few tried) ever did it before successfully?
The reverse trike is inherently unstable in turns.
The Penstar, Tiltingworks, GG Taurus or Tremoto are very low volume products aimed at enthusiasts and not the mass market.
I can't comment on their systems but I doubt if a major manufacturer would bring out a trike without some form of vehicle stability system due to the instability of the reverse trike configuration.
A VSS (not necessarily the Bosch) is, IMHO, necessary on a vehicle like the Spyder if it is going to be mass marketed.