ARtraveler
R.I.P. Dwayne
I am looking at buying an RT or F3 and am wondering why there are so many bikes with low <5k miles.
Is it because of issues with the bike or just not what someone expected or enjoys riding?
Thanks,
Barender
Glad to address your question. Many above have hit the nail on the head. The good news. These days it is not because of issues with the bikes. Overall, the product is good and breakdowns (they do happen) are few and far between.
We have an interesting demographic. Most have a bit more money to experiment with and buy new toys. And...the :spyder2::spyder: :ani29:'s are expensive toys at that. Many, I fear, jumped in and found it was not their cup of tea. Others start at bottom or mid-line and eventually end up with the top of the line. The good side: this makes for a great used market with low mileage on many of the bikes.
I started with the base SM5/GS when they first came out in 08. Spouse got involved and we bought her a new 09 RS/SE5. Then the RT's came out. I had to have a 2010 Premier. In 12, I bought a new 2011 RT. Four model years in a row at first. Then I slowed down a bit. A new 2014 RT in 2014 and now I just bought a 19 F3L. I am thinking the last two will be keepers and I am now done. I did say that when I bought the 14 though. :roflblack: The 2011 is now being traded in on the F3.
My experience has been good. On the six Spyders owned, I have 152,000 assorted miles. No miles on the 19 yet. Still waiting for delivery. So far, none have had mechanical issues or breakdowns leaving me stranded on the highway. And between 2008 and this year...all of those Spyders were in AK. Now I have moved to an area where I can ride year around. And...my plans are to take advantage of the situation. I'm only 74, so have a while to enjoy the Spyders.
Last edited: