daveinva
New member
My thoughts, repeated:
-- Having had the RS for a year with the "sporty" position and then three years with the "standard" (footboard and risers) position, there is no question in my mind that the Spyder handles corners FAR better from a standard position than a sport position. It's not even debatable, IMHO.
The reasons why a sport position works for a sport motorcycle is directly related to a sport bike's geometry and rake, as well as the need to counter-steer. There's no equivalent distinction between a Spyder RS and a Spyder RT-- they're the same geometry, you just sit on them differently. Similarly, the single most important Spyder rider-controlled factor in high-speed handling-- getting your butt off that seat and shifted to the inside-- is far easier to transition quickly and smoothly when your feet are flat* on boards and you aren't (needlessly) leaned forward. That sport position may "feel" fun to some, but it's all in your head.
* I say flat except I keep my heels on my "sport pegs," using my toes on the footboard to shift my weight. I cheat.
-- A quad doesn't have a nanny because a quad has four wheels, and is not intended for road travel at road speeds on cambered roads. A snowmobile doesn't have a nanny because a snowmobile only has one "wheel", and is incapable of road travel.
Finally, aside from the fact that overwhelming majority of conventional trikes are after-market conversions, I know of no conventional trike rider that would argue that they handle *better* than a Spyder, i.e. the fact that a conventional trike doesn't have a nanny to stop you from going goblin isn't a selling point, for Pete's sake.
Anyway, I'm all for tweaking the Spyder nanny-- the F3 sounds like a step in a fun direction-- but I trust the engineers and demo riders: you're simply not riding the Spyder at sound speeds in anything other than a straight line without it.
P.S. Will somebody disconnect their nanny already and experiment for the group? There are YEARS of these threads already, endless armchair arguments proclaiming the stupidity of Bosch and the legal-cowardice of BRP. I've seen it explained here before at Spyderlovers how to disconnect the nanny if folks are inclined to make the effort. Do it, already-- DO IT FOR SCIENCE! :thumbup: :joke:
-- Having had the RS for a year with the "sporty" position and then three years with the "standard" (footboard and risers) position, there is no question in my mind that the Spyder handles corners FAR better from a standard position than a sport position. It's not even debatable, IMHO.
The reasons why a sport position works for a sport motorcycle is directly related to a sport bike's geometry and rake, as well as the need to counter-steer. There's no equivalent distinction between a Spyder RS and a Spyder RT-- they're the same geometry, you just sit on them differently. Similarly, the single most important Spyder rider-controlled factor in high-speed handling-- getting your butt off that seat and shifted to the inside-- is far easier to transition quickly and smoothly when your feet are flat* on boards and you aren't (needlessly) leaned forward. That sport position may "feel" fun to some, but it's all in your head.
* I say flat except I keep my heels on my "sport pegs," using my toes on the footboard to shift my weight. I cheat.

-- A quad doesn't have a nanny because a quad has four wheels, and is not intended for road travel at road speeds on cambered roads. A snowmobile doesn't have a nanny because a snowmobile only has one "wheel", and is incapable of road travel.
Finally, aside from the fact that overwhelming majority of conventional trikes are after-market conversions, I know of no conventional trike rider that would argue that they handle *better* than a Spyder, i.e. the fact that a conventional trike doesn't have a nanny to stop you from going goblin isn't a selling point, for Pete's sake.
Anyway, I'm all for tweaking the Spyder nanny-- the F3 sounds like a step in a fun direction-- but I trust the engineers and demo riders: you're simply not riding the Spyder at sound speeds in anything other than a straight line without it.
P.S. Will somebody disconnect their nanny already and experiment for the group? There are YEARS of these threads already, endless armchair arguments proclaiming the stupidity of Bosch and the legal-cowardice of BRP. I've seen it explained here before at Spyderlovers how to disconnect the nanny if folks are inclined to make the effort. Do it, already-- DO IT FOR SCIENCE! :thumbup: :joke: