Rogue Hawk
Active member
In hiding....once he found out he had the biggest carbon foot print of anyone in the US and what he should pay for it....:roflblack::roflblack:
Yeah, he put his carbon foot in his mouth.
In hiding....once he found out he had the biggest carbon foot print of anyone in the US and what he should pay for it....:roflblack::roflblack:
All that I know, is that as my bones get older :shocked:: the Winters feel colder! nojoke
My speculation is that it was caused by a single ill-fated young dinosaur, who upon sensing familiar ground vibrations, knew that his mother was about to catch him smoking and heedlessly tossed his burning cigarette into some nearby brush in the forest. The rest, as they say, is history.If humankind is the cause of global warming then what caused the warming that melted the polar ice cap eons ago when man was not a factor?
I'm guessing that the CO2 levels the past 60 years have been measured directly in the air. The readings from thousands of years ago were taken from ice core samples. Do we know, and with what certainty, how direct readings correlate with the ice readings?
Here's climate change to think about... Polar ice cap up North is decreasing; polar ice cap down at the South end is increasing faster than the other is decreasing!!!
Also, NOAA has decreased its global reporting stations by more than 50%!!! Convenient????
Don't forget he invented the Internet........ :yikes:
Don't forget he invented the Internet........ :yikes:
Now I'm NOT saying that Climate Change isn't something we are going to have to come to terms with & learn how to live with; but presenting 'snapshots' of evidence like that above can sometimes be extremely misleading, & (definitely not saying this is going on here!!) they can even be selectively chosen to support whichever particular argument an unscrupulous operator may want to push!! You've really got to take a long term view, especially when it comes to matters of planetary weather patterns & the short term peaks & troughs that occur over the millennia of continual changes our Planet & Sun must experience! :shocked:
So I won't bother to add any more graphs or charts to contribute to the confusion, but if you care to delve deeper & have a look for yourselves, you'll discover that right now, & in fact for most of Mankind's so called 'Industrial Age', the planet we live on has been going thru a (fairly short on a geological scale) period of having the LOWEST LEVELS of CO2 that it's ever had!! Back a couple of thousand years or so, CO2 levels were somewhat higher - go back even further & they were even higher again, & not just by a little bit either!! In fact IIRC, for most of the time that Mankind has been active on this planet, CO2 levels in the atmosphere have been significantly HIGHER than they are now & even higher than the highest levels they are expected to reach in the next century, even if we continue contributing to that rise at the current rate!! :shocked:
Yet those significantly higher levels of CO2 in the atmosphere are the levels that were present during Mankind's rise to 'intelligence'?!? And arguably, as we look at the peaks & troughs that have occurred over the relatively short time we've been around, the smaller rises & subsequent higher peaks that we've seen along the way were often part of what created the conditions that enabled each of Mankind's 'Great Leaps Forwards' - the lower dips also often coinciding with the fall of whichever current civilisation was ascendant at the time; ie, the last Mini Ice Age, the Dark Ages etc, & the many similar short term downturns that have occurred in the steady rise of Mankind from insignificance to whatever we may be now!!
Sooo, are the current generally LOW levels of CO2 we've been experiencing just heralding the fall of civilisation as we know it (just who did you vote for??); or are the very recent increases we've seen really just the precursor of Mankind's Next Great Leap Forwards?? :dontknow:
Personally, I don't know, (dunno who it was you voted for either?!) but I'll put some more thought to it later - right now, I'm gonna get the Spyder out & go for a ryde! :thumbup:
I'm guessing that the CO2 levels the past 60 years have been measured directly in the air. The readings from thousands of years ago were taken from ice core samples. Do we know, and with what certainty, how direct readings correlate with the ice readings?
So far as we know, everybody dies, however many believe in reincarnation, so for them I suppose what's a 100 years or more, they will keep coming backnojoke Everybody dies eventually: why worry about what will happen in a thousand years...
...or even a hundred? :dontknow:
The light one sees as they are slipping away from this earthly existence just may be the overhead light in the delivery room as they are being born in a new body!! :roflblack::roflblack:So far as we know, everybody dies, however many believe in reincarnation, so for them I suppose what's a 100 years or more, they will keep coming back![]()
Within the past year or so I saw and (casually) read a news item about a study by Russian scientists that addressed that thought, that very question.Ya don't think the our class M variable star has anything to do with it???
But the Russians are currently persona-non-grata in this country .....