BajaRon
Well-known member
Do you lean towards one size over the other?
Don't over think this. I like the 175's because I like the look of wide tires (which is purely cosmetic). Functionally, the difference isn't going to be all that much. The lower profile of the 175 is slightly better for cornering. But the 165's give you lower rolling resistance which means slightly better fuel mileage. If you like the look of wider tires, go with the 175. If you want a bit better ride and fuel mileage, go with the 165.
So I have a 2015 F3. Looking for new tires and trying to find Vredestein Quatrac. I just want to make sure on sizes. Front I will want 175/55/15 and the rear I will want 205/60/15. Is that correct sizing for those tires. Also, if I cannot find the Vredestein here in Newfoundland Canada, what do you think of the Kenda KR20 Kanine?
Yes, for Vredestein's, these will work fine. I don't think you can beat the Vredestein Quatrac for wet conditions on the Spyder. There are better tires out there. But they won't fit our Spyders so it's a moot point.
As for the Kenda Kanine, I just put one on my Spyder. I haven't ridden it yet but plan to do about 300 miles on it soon.
I do like the concept and I've got several customers who love them. I have heard others say they don't like the Kanine but I've not spoken to them personally. Just read about it. My first impression is that I'm going to like that rear tire. The only thing I don't know is longevity and if they will wear in the middle as the OEM's do. I've heard reports from both directions on that account.
Last edited by a moderator: