I am all in favor of fuel efficiency and conservation, but am definitely NOT in favor of mandates from my government. I own a Tahoe hybrid, I am not a granola, I just did not want to send any more cash than necessary to the a--holes in Saudi Arabia. I would be interested in a hybrid spyder, if, and only if, it had the performance to match the standard models. 57 hp, is not ever going to do it for me. Maybe as a commuter for some people, but I do this for fun and speed. 57 ponies?? That must be some sort of joke. Maybe if it was a children's version. I had my 12 year-old riding a snowmobile with more power than that! Just my 2 cents.
:agree: Yeah, if it's a true hybrid it'll run on electric drive at low speeds, then electric+gas at high speeds, i.e. it ain't just 57 hp.
That said, if the performance can't at least equal the current RS, this holds no appeal to me. Who wouldn't love the extra mileage, but the current Rotax is barely adequate for the RS (and underpowered for the RT), so losing any more performance is a non-starter.
The real shame, frankly, is that they're not able to put this in the *RT* first. The extra range is wasted on the RS given its "around town" character, but the RT could definitely use the added touring range.
Of course, all of this assumes the price is equal to what they charge now. We all know that it won't be (unless we can get another infernal tax credit for this?)
Anyway, it's neat stuff, hope it works, but honestly, at this early stage in the Spyder history I'd rather have had BRP spend the time and money putting a stronger engine into the RS and RT vice messing with a hybrid.
Reality: An environmental fluff commercial--with no specific details that count.
No information about production, cost, etc. Same thing we have been seeing for the last couple of years. I also would like to save gas and cheat the oil barons out of some cash--but am not willing to pay twice the value of the vehicle to do it. (Chevy Volt) and similar overpriced hybrids.
Hey Doc,
I heard Donald Parmaleau is handling the R&D. After doing such a swell job with the 2010 GBR for the Magog Parade, the hybrid should be out by 2099.
BRP has been a leader in producing some really revolutionary motors in snowmobiles that are very efficient and still have great power. The e-tec mills for example. If they really want to make these trikes more fuel efficient, they could start with cutting weight. Speed is not just about horsepower, it is also about power to weight ratios. Drag is another area where they might be able to improve fuel efficiency.
:agree: Yeah, if it's a true hybrid it'll run on electric drive at low speeds, then electric+gas at high speeds, i.e. it ain't just 57 hp.
That said, if the performance can't at least equal the current RS, this holds no appeal to me. Who wouldn't love the extra mileage, but the current Rotax is barely adequate for the RS (and underpowered for the RT), so losing any more performance is a non-starter.
The real shame, frankly, is that they're not able to put this in the *RT* first. The extra range is wasted on the RS given its "around town" character, but the RT could definitely use the added touring range.
Of course, all of this assumes the price is equal to what they charge now. We all know that it won't be (unless we can get another infernal tax credit for this?)
Anyway, it's neat stuff, hope it works, but honestly, at this early stage in the Spyder history I'd rather have had BRP spend the time and money putting a stronger engine into the RS and RT vice messing with a hybrid.
hi bob .. thought you know that
69kg engine&generator - 600ccm 2 cilynder 57HP - 25 HP electro (Rotax ACE from skidoo)
don`t know the size/weight from the batterie .. think about 25 extra kg (depending how many miles you will be able to drive without fuel..)
the software to "connect" this two engines ... 10 x ?? the spyder-VSS-System ?
last problem - to produce a little noise when it runs in full-electro-modus ..
I hope they allow me some test-miles in the nearer future - I´ll take my R2D2 with meView attachment 38404
I could be wrong on this but don't electric motors have hugh amounts of torque compared to an equal gas engine.....Scotty ?????......Mike..:thumbup: