Sorry, I just don't get the Harley thing. As a group I don't like Harley riders. As for Harley's they are just now with the current models bringing them out of the 1960's technology wise. They are big, heavy, slow, loud, hard to maneuver, expensive and ugly (except for the V-Rod). No, I have never owned a Harley, but then again I have never had malaria, but I know enough about both to know I want neither.
Far be it for me to defend HD, but.........
HD is kinda stuck because they have to appeal to their fan base. Their bikes are designed around what their customers want and expect, and they deliver just that, as their sales figures indicate. They're heavy, slow, and clunky because they're built to be tough and to last a lot of miles. They stick with push rods because that means their valve never need adjustment, and not because they don't know or understand newer technology. And, for the record, the new HD do have quite a bit of new tech stuff, like Brembo anti-lock braking systems, etc.
The new HD's are better built that the new Beemers, as evidenced by the latest motorcycle customer (problems reported) surveys, showing BMW makes the worse motorcycles in available in the US market by a BIG margin (of the major manufacturers), with Yamaha being the best. Can Am was not rated.
While I completely agree that I don't get the whole pirate thing, a lot of people do and they spend A LOT of money doing it. I also don't get the chrome thing either. It's just like I don't understand why a lot of beemer riders are utter snobs.
I don't own any HD products at this time, but may in the future. I have owned 2 HD's and 2 beemers previously, so I think I'm pretty familiar with them. I do have a good friend with a new HD bagger (Street Glide, I think) and it is a truly nice motorcycle. From my limited riding experience, I'd say HD hit the bullseye for it's intended use.
