I had a 2006 Goldwing (NOT a trike) and NEVER got close to 40mpg. The Wing has a 1800cc 6-cylinder! It's thirsty!
Goldwing Trikes (any trikes really) get TERRIBLE gas mileage. The Spyder RT is the best in the 3-wheel category, other than the RS/GS.
Plus, by paying $15,000 LESS for my Spyder RT compared to a Wing/Harley Trike, I can buy a lot of fuel for that $15,000!
V.
:2thumbs:
![]()
Deal's Gap on a holiday week-end and no people...rock slide side-effect.
![]()
Z
Ah, gas mileage . . . now that we have two Spyders, I have to wonder why we didn't just buy a Prius and a Rascal (old folks electric scooter) and you know what? Fun! As far as 3 wheelers go, my CB-750 with a sidecar gets about 26 mpg, handles like a truck, and my wife would rather walk than ride . . . . and isn't even interested in driving it. . . . now that she is indulging in an RS . . . . I'm thinking that I/we, should buy stock in Shell Oil .. . . :yes::yes:I've never heard of a Goldwing Trike getting 40mpg, all the guys I know who have them pretty much get the same as us.
On my RT SE I've got as low as 19.5mpg and as high as 37mpg. With the trailer I seem to be around 25-28mpg. Without the trailer I average 28-32mpg depending how I drive.
I just drove over 9,000 miles 4 gallons at a time and my only real complaint about the RT is it needs to be able to go at least 200 miles with a reserve of at least 30 miles. I would like to see 250 miles but I don't think that's going to happen on a three wheeler.
Just read the Rider review of the RT and they mentioned gas mileage in the high 20's, said the low light came on as early as 90 miles! Is this true? Any solutions except keep putting gas in the bike during a trip?
Mike
I'm thinking that I/we, should buy stock in Shell Oil .. . . :yes::yes:
Is everyone across the board using 93 Octane (which I believe is recommended by the manual) - or are some using 87 or 89? Curious...
Is everyone across the board using 91 Octane (which I believe is recommended by the manual) - or are some using 87 or 89? Curious...
First, the engine is 1,000 cc (actually 998), not 900. The numbers don't really matter, though, and the RT performance, while not stellar, is more than adequate. Second, it is not really appropriate to compare fuel mileage to a 2-wheeler. If you compare to a typical 3-wheeler, the Spyder holds its own. Finally, premium fuel is not an unusual need. My BMW needs mid-grade, at a minimum...and unlike the Spyder RT, it will not adjust to regular fuel. If I ride the Spyder 10,000 miles in a year, the extra cost for premium is about $70. That's not enough to make me sweat. It seems to me you've already made up your mind. Better stick to that Grand Cherokee.I have to admit I have been giving the RT some serious thought. I like everything about it except the engine. I think 900cc is just to small and busy for such a large machine and the tested average mileage of 26.5mpg on premium is just plain aweful. My stealth gets pretty poor mileage at 31-32 but I can at least go 230 miles between fill ups.
As much as I like the RT I am going to hang with my GL1800 and the Stealth until BRP or someone comes up with a more logical and efficient power plant. And really -premium? That's the equivalent of getting 22mpg on regular which is what my Jeep Grand Cherokee gets.
At that rate is would be more economical to trailer the RT behind the Jeep ala HD style.