• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

To Brake or Not To Brake....

Would you like BRP to include a front brake lever?

  • No thank you - I'm fine with the one brake peddle

    Votes: 66 33.5%
  • Yes, I'd love to have a front brake lever

    Votes: 119 60.4%
  • I'm not sure if I'd want it or not

    Votes: 12 6.1%

  • Total voters
    197

BajaRon

Well-known member
Simple poll question. Would you like to see BRP put a front hand brake on the Spyder?

Let's say it would add $150.00 to the cost of a Spyder to put a front hand brake on every new unit. I think this would be a reasonable cost since the parts are already available. You just need a slave cylinder, lever and hose to the current master cylinder. A bit of engineering and you're done.

I agree that a front brake is not necessary, but neither are fenders or a windshield. When you get right down to it there are a lot of 'Unnecessary' things on our Spyders.

To be clear, the front brake simply actuates the current braking system. All 3 wheels brake just as they do with the foot peddle. The front brake is simply a 2nd (optional) point of braking input, not a separate braking system. So all VSS and Anti-Lock features remain fully functional. No learning curve, no need to ever touch the front brake if you so choose. Just there if you do decide you'd like to try it.
 
Last edited:
I would like to see it as an add on option for the ones that do want one, and as a later addition if one desires, but in my personal choice, I am fine without it. Like you said, Ron, the current one offered by ISCI is an actuator so it really doesn't make a difference, but as an add-on later in the future is good to know it is avaliable.
 
Age Has A Lot To Do With This Requirement

The older you get the slower the feet and legs move. Much faster grabbing the hand brake while moving the foot to your foot brake. Still want the foot brake because along with slower legs comes weaker hand grip so you still need the foot pressure to stop quickly....
 
absolutely yes

No reason in the world not to have it. I would think legally BRP can not offer highway pegs without a hand brake. This should not even have to be a discussion point. But to answer your poll, yes.
 
I would like to see it as an add on option for the ones that do want one, and as a later addition if one desires, but in my personal choice, I am fine without it. Like you said, Ron, the current one offered by ISCI is an actuator so it really doesn't make a difference, but as an add-on later in the future is good to know it is avaliable.

If BRP offered it as an option I think it would be much more expensive plus cost of install. True, those that didn't want a front brake would not have to pay for one, but those that did would be looking at a much steeper cost.

My feeling is that may who think they don't want a front brake would actually come to appreciate it once they did have one. But like all opinions, mine is worth the going rate! ;)
 
Many of us who have transitioned from 2 to 3 wheels, would probably feel more comfortable with a hand brake because it's what we are familiar with. It could be a positive thing. For others that haven't riden 2 wheeled bikes, it probably won't be a big deal. Personally, I really don't miss the hand brake but if the spyder came with one; I'm sure I would make use of it. Dale
 
I agree that a front brake is not necessary, but neither are fenders or a windshield. When you get right down to it there are a lot of 'Unnecessary' things on our Spyders.


Yes, some might argue the Spyder has one wheel too many too, but the 3rd one makes it safer... same logic applys for a front brake lever, a redundant safety feature. That, and volume production will bring the price of it down for the mobility challenged riders.
 
I'm not sure cause I haven't ridden a Spyder yet. That will happen this spring. My gut tells that if I had the option, I'd probably get it.

Tony
 
I think it would be great and make riding both on two and three wheels a bit safer for those with both vehicles.
 
Lets just say if they do it next year I will be a sitting on the side of my bed just shaking my head saying why didnt i wait.. Which by the way Lamont should add that has a Icon,, Little confused face shaking head bak and forth with hand on knee.. My state of mind after most purchases..
 
for me 100% YES !! never understood why they are not offering that ..
best would be if it works only on the frontwheels - but lets see how the new Brembos are adjusted ..(waiting for Lamonts-first-testbrakes...)
 
Back
Top