• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Tire search - what is everyone going to these days?

I’m really upset - borderline angry! I just went on one of my favorite twisty roads with my newly installed Vredestein 165/60R15 tires on the RTL - replacing the factory Kenda tires. I can’t believe how much easier and smoother the Vredestein tires are. I wish I had replaced them the day I purchased the Spyder! The cornering takes less upper body strength. They are grippy without any play. In the hard corners, the front end feels lighter, more agile, and responsive. It’s taken me about a year to transition from 2 wheels to 3. My biggest issue was how heavy I had to press the handlebars in tight corners. Lo and behold - it was the tires! Who knew? I’ll never go back!
 
Why would you put anything Kenda on a Spyder, after reading about all the problems with them?
I'm running the Kanines on my GS. You have to understand that Kenda is producing OEM tires to BRP's specifications and price requirements. It isn't necessarily true that they don't know how to make a decent tire. While the jury is still out on the Kanines, my early impressions are quite positive. With the advantage that dealerships that will not mount a so called, 'Car Tire', will install a set of Kanines. It is not unreasonable to consider using them.
 
Last edited:
I'm running the Kanines on my GS. You have to understand that Kenda is producing OEM tires to BRP's specifications and price requirements. It isn't necessarily true that they don't know how to make a decent tire. While the jury is still out on the Kanines, my early impressions are quite positive. With the advantage that dealerships that will not mount a so called, 'Car Tire', will install a set of Kanines. It is not unreasonable to consider using them.
With my prior discussed fitment issues with 165/60R15 Vredesteins, I opted for a set of 165/55R15 Kanines. While offering a softer ride than the Vredestein, I am not unhappy with the Kanines. It will also be interesting to see how the newly designed 2025 Kenda tires fare? While not a true car tire, they certainly could prove quite adequate. Time will tell...
 
With my prior discussed fitment issues with 165/60R15 Vredesteins, I opted for a set of 165/55R15 Kanines. While offering a softer ride than the Vredestein, I am not unhappy with the Kanines. It will also be interesting to see how the newly designed 2025 Kenda tires fare? While not a true car tire, they certainly could prove quite adequate. Time will tell...
I am surprised that you had issues with the Vredestein tires. We have mounted a great many with the only issues being conflict with modified wiring hold-down tabs. Which we were able to easily correct. I wonder what was different about your install.

Still, we have not been able to find a better front tire for the Spyder than the Vredestein's. Though I believe the Kanines are a worthy option.
 
I've been pretty happy with the original Kendas on the front of my F3S.
I have a Kumho Ecsta AST to go on the rear, but I'll probably get a set of the updated Kanines for the front.
There's a definite weight advantage, and with only about 300# on each tire, they don't need much in the way of weight carrying ability.
 
I am surprised that you had issues with the Vredestein tires. We have mounted a great many with the only issues being conflict with modified wiring hold-down tabs. Which we were able to easily correct. I wonder what was different about your install.

Still, we have not been able to find a better front tire for the Spyder than the Vredestein's. Though I believe the Kanines are a worthy option.
I see that Vredestein has a 175/55R15 tire that is slightly smaller in diameter (22.5" versus 22.8"). Spending $250 a pair and rubbing would really tick me off :( I see plenty of off brand 175/55R15 tires for sale in the $120/pair range, then add $40 for mounting/balancing. That would be a bit less painful. I do like my generic Achilles Ekonomist 165/55R15 tires, but like the Federal Formoza, they are no longer available stateside. Damn ....
 
I see that Vredestein has a 175/55R15 tire that is slightly smaller in diameter (22.5" versus 22.8"). Spending $250 a pair and rubbing would really tick me off :( I see plenty of off brand 175/55R15 tires for sale in the $120/pair range, then add $40 for mounting/balancing. That would be a bit less painful. I do like my generic Achilles Ekonomist 165/55R15 tires, but like the Federal Formoza, they are no longer available stateside. Damn ....
We have not had good luck with the 175/55R15's on the 2020+ Spyders. BRP changed the front fender configuration slightly and the 175 is usually too wide and will rub. We did get 1 or 2 sets to fit early on before we started having consistent clearance issues. It just isn't worth it to us to put a set on just to see. Now we only install the 165/60R15's on the 20+ Spyders. So, from our experience, the 175's might work. But more often than not, they don't.

The 2013-2019 Spyders take both the 165 and the 175 without issue. Though you need to be careful if any aftermarket lights have been run through the fenders.

Having said all of this, at the risk of beating a dead horse. We've not had any real issues with the 165's. I guess it's just me. But your story bothers me more than it should. I'd love to know they why.
 
We have not had good luck with the 175/55R15's on the 2020+ Spyders. BRP changed the front fender configuration slightly and the 175 is usually too wide and will rub. We did get 1 or 2 sets to fit early on before we started having consistent clearance issues. It just isn't worth it to us to put a set on just to see. Now we only install the 165/60R15's on the 20+ Spyders. So, from our experience, the 175's might work. But more often than not, they don't.

The 2013-2019 Spyders take both the 165 and the 175 without issue. Though you need to be careful if any aftermarket lights have been run through the fenders.

Having said all of this, at the risk of beating a dead horse. We've not had any real issues with the 165's. I guess it's just me. But your story bothers me more than it should. I'd love to know they why.
Yeah .. The Vredestein 165/60 fit just fine in my 2019 F3S. I did shim my 2022 fenders and installed lower profile screws. I do have Show Chrome Slayer fender lights, but they're tucked up nicely. Dunno ????
 
We have not had good luck with the 175/55R15's on the 2020+ Spyders. BRP changed the front fender configuration slightly and the 175 is usually too wide and will rub. We did get 1 or 2 sets to fit early on before we started having consistent clearance issues. It just isn't worth it to us to put a set on just to see. Now we only install the 165/60R15's on the 20+ Spyders. So, from our experience, the 175's might work. But more often than not, they don't.

The 2013-2019 Spyders take both the 165 and the 175 without issue. Though you need to be careful if any aftermarket lights have been run through the fenders.

Having said all of this, at the risk of beating a dead horse. We've not had any real issues with the 165's. I guess it's just me. But your story bothers me more than it should. I'd love to know they why.
Strange, have had zero issues fitting the Yokohama AVID 175/55R15 on the newer bikes.
 
Back
Top