Well, that's your opinion. I don't agree with it but that's OK

I think the Spyder nanny could lighten up.
Not my opinion-- the professional judgment of BRP's and Polaris' engineers, who each recognize the genuine differences between a motorcycle-like trike and a car-like trike.
You can search through years of threads: every person with
first-hand knowledge of how a Spyder rides without a Nanny, whether a BRP designer, Bosch engineer, or test rider, agreed the Spyder was unrideable without the Nanny, as surely as a modern fighter jet is unflyable without computers.
That doesn't mean the Nanny can't stand refinement-- it *has* been adjusted over the years-- but it's presence is
required by the architecture of the roadster. Again, height, width and weight of the Spyder is obviously completely different from that of a car-like reverse trike such as the Slingshot, Morgan, X-Bow, etc. Those differences place different requirements on traction control, stability control, and ABS. And, no small detail, Spyder riders sit *atop* their vehicle, not nestled in it close to the ground. Even if the Spyder *could* corner without a Nanny, no rider is going to be comfortable atop one.
Physics matters.
But, as always, the challenge is out there: the Nanny *can* be disabled (there's a thread around here somewhere that walked through all the sensors that had to be disconnected). To my knowledge, despite the many musings here at SL, no one has ever taken the leap to follow through with their desires. Who will be first? :firstplace: