• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Taylor Swift

I just happened to catch the tail end (pun intended) of what the lawsuit is about, when watching a morning tv news show yesterday.

This pic. is supposedly the smoking gun in the Federal Court groping case:

http://www.tmz.com/2016/11/12/taylor-swift-butt-grab-dj-lawsuit-photo/

Based on that photo, I'm not seeing what was described. In all fairness, she's only sueing for a dollar, and any extra will go to a women's charity.

She is also a diva. No 'commoner' should dare touch her.
 
I have a totally different opinion. Me thinks after having his statement read that as being a DJ and jumping in the picture he may have actually placed his arm and hand to low, and not in the middle of her back. What she experienced without being able to prove what she felt happened. She just shared it with the radio station. She did not ask for him to be fired. She is 5'10" and he looks about 6'3" His right arm is awfully low, and that smile is a dead giveaway :lecturef_smilie: he's guilty. He lost his job he says over it and sued her for 3 million. She is not seeking publicity. She has plenty of that. Her countersuit is for $1.




Wonder what the comments would be if it were your daughter?

Me thinks they don't have daughters, just jokes (of which some are very good)
 
I have a totally different opinion. Me thinks after having his statement read that as being a DJ and jumping in the picture he may have actually placed his arm and hand to low, and not in the middle of her back. What she experienced without being able to prove what she felt happened. She just shared it with the radio station. She did not ask for him to be fired. She is 5'10" and he looks about 6'3" His right arm is awfully low, and that smile is a dead giveaway :lecturef_smilie: he's guilty. He lost his job he says over it and sued her for 3 million. She is not seeking publicity. She has plenty of that. Her countersuit is for $1.






Me thinks they don't have daughters, just jokes (of which some are very good)

I still say if his hand was up her dress, you'd notice it by the side/sides of the dress crumpled up. She stated his hand was up her dress, and not just laying/grasping on her butt.
 
I still say if his hand was up her dress, you'd notice it by the side/sides of the dress crumpled up. She stated his hand was up her dress, and not just laying/grasping on her butt.

:agree: There's nothing at all in that picture, that suggests her dress has been lifted... nojoke

It is a one shot still photograph, nothing more......except his behind her in the lower rear extremities, All you dress experts, needing the dress to be crumpled up, you don't even know what the material is, and if it is susceptible to doing what you claim it is not :banghead: This is why we have juries listen to the evidence, whether he did it or not, may not be able to prove, but whether she got him fired, is what he needs to prove, that I am sure they will get to the bottom of.
 
Okay, I just can't resist an answer to this thread:


A word of advice: Try not become the butt of all the bottom jokes. :roflblack::roflblack:
 
Last edited:
It is a one shot still photograph, nothing more......except his behind her in the lower rear extremities, All you dress experts, needing the dress to be crumpled up, you don't even know what the material is, and if it is susceptible to doing what you claim it is not :banghead: This is why we have juries listen to the evidence, whether he did it or not, may not be able to prove, but whether she got him fired, is what he needs to prove, that I am sure they will get to the bottom of.

She (Taylor Swift) said it was a smoking gun pic. In other words, it supposedly shows his hand is under her dress. Whether or not you are a dress material expert, I have no idea, and don't care.

My gf is my expert, that's her skill set, clothes, and skin care. But, I'll let her know that you said she knows not of what she speaks.

I have a list of all the experts on SL's, and what they are expert in. I'll put your name under dress material. You did notice that I said that that was my opinion, in the post you quoted; I wasn't't saying I was an expert? You seem to like to fly off the handle for no reason.
 
Last edited:
I just happened to catch the tail end (pun intended) of what the lawsuit is about, when watching a morning tv news show yesterday.

This pic. is supposedly the smoking gun in the Federal Court groping case:

http://www.tmz.com/2016/11/12/taylor-swift-butt-grab-dj-lawsuit-photo/

Based on that photo, I'm not seeing what was described. In all fairness, she's only sueing for a dollar, and any extra will go to a women's charity.

You presented this to all us here

The arm has 3 joints; but, I agree with you.

humorous, jmo

I only know the picture, which she said is her smoking gun, does not show a hand up her dress, IMO. The sides of her dress would be off kilter, if there were a hand up her dress.
Now, where was his hand placed on the outside of her clothes; I have no idea. I also have no idea why she is smiling, if his hand was up her dress.

IMO does not vindicate you when you may be wrong, nor does it implicate you as an expert.

Seems to me that you guys are Very Closely inspecting the picture.



Why not. It's the cornerstone of her case.

not true, testimony was the cornerstone to the case this was just a powerful exhibit linking the two to the matter. jmo
I don't know how you grab ass, but it looks to me that its totally doable in that pix. Been there done that :yes::yes::yes::yes::yes:

ahh Hah, :clap::thumbup:

You need to have your eyes checked, if you think his hand is up her dress.

Of course it is doable, if you grabbed one that sagged down to her knees, or you dream a lot.
:gaah: which is it?

I still say if his hand was up her dress, you'd notice it by the side/sides of the dress crumpled up. She stated his hand was up her dress, and not just laying/grasping on her butt.

You did not mention this was your gf's expert opinion, you took credit for that statement.

She (Taylor Swift) said it was a smoking gun pic. In other words, it supposedly shows his hand is under her dress. Whether or not you are a dress material expert, I have no idea, and don't care.

My gf is my expert, that's her skill set, clothes, and skin care. But, I'll let her know that you said she knows not of what she speaks.

I have a list of all the experts on SL's, and what they are expert in. I'll put your name under dress material. You did notice that I said that that was my opinion, in the post you quoted; I wasn't't saying I was an expert? You seem to like to fly off the handle for no reason.

Would love to see this list of experts on SL's, and what they are an expert in. I do have an off shore apparel factory,(manufacture bikinis) (very little material) but not saying I am an expert in that field or in witness photography.

Yo settle down, not picking a fight with your gf's expertise in determining the material make-up of a dress from a photograph or your manhood.:)

And yes JerryB beat me to it, but read the article not just the headlines"click: http://www.tmz.com/2017/08/11/taylor-swift-trial-butt-groping-win-dj-mueller/

What gets me to where I venture in disagreements when topics arise where we slander the innocents, whether they are celebrity, political or just us.

And I happen to like her music and her contributions to society. Heck I even enjoyed her guest judge mentorship on the Voice.:cheers: I am biased I suppose, but the judge so far through out his case for $$$$
 
I am guessing this is a moot issue now. Internet today, said the case was thrown out of court.

And that's the "bottom" line. :roflblack::roflblack:
 
:roflblack: I sort of doubt that you would: you're too busy wasting time while reading this thread!
Isn't that a bit ironic?Belly Laugh.gif
 
Back
Top