Starting to look at a rt

[Leemorin]

Hi everybody
My wife and I are starting to look into buying a rt and would like some advise. Should we stay away from any years for problems or they all about the same? And any other things we should look for, we will be going to dealers to look. Any help would be appreciated

thanks

 

[ndspyderlover]

Hi everybody
My wife and I are starting to look into buying a rt and would like some advise. Should we stay away from any years for problems or they all about the same? And any other things we should look for, we will be going to dealers to look. Any help would be appreciated

thanks

You should be looking for the 1330 engine.

 

[OverHillAndDale]

2013s were a trouble-prone year although I think they got most of the issues (including heat issues) fixed with recalls.

Pre-2013s have V-Twin engines and 5 speed (semi-automatic) transmissions. It's a good power train but you may have to maintain the RPMs higher than you're used to in most cruiser type V-Twins. 2014 forward has a 3 cylinder in-line motor and a 6 speed transmission. New motor is higher torque, lower RPM than its predecessor and it's been reliable so far. Most people who have owned both much prefer the newer motor. Bob Denman has both and I'm confident he'll chime in with his assessment (and some meme) shortly.

Happy shopping - you won't go wrong.

 

[pwm]

I have a 12 with no issues but if I was out looking again, like stated above, go with a 14 up for the 1330 engine. The 998 is peppy but the 1330 with the power gain and the fuel mileage gain is the way to go.

 

[Bob Denman]

Throw another vote on the "1330" pile! :thumbup:
Although the 998 bikes are still pretty darn good too!

 

[tmcquain]

Welcome ! Hope you find the Spyder that is perfect for you. I have never had the chance to ride any other than my 2015 RT-S SE6....for me and my wife that is the best option. +1 on the 1330 engine...can't go wrong with the triple...

 

[Zip]

Welcome

I have a 2010 RT SM5 and am very happy with it. The 1330 engine would probably be nice but even though the wife wants one I don't think I would get the semi auto but hey you never know.

 

[Saluda]

Love the 1330 motor (had no issues with their first motor) and the semi-auto transmission.
Lot of years of shifting behind me (vehicles & bikes) so I was ready for the change.
Check out the left overs if you can afford it. Takes some sting out of their high pricing. Good luck.

 

[sealfloorboards]

I love my '14 with the 1330. Had an '11 and it was also a great bike but can't compare to my '14. I always get the base model and "trick" it from there. A '15 or '16 would be a great bike. If you want Floorboards instead of pegs, check out my Seal Floorboards. Save a bunch of $$$ and get the best RT Floorboard available anywhere:2thumbs:. Who needs a set of tiny suitcases anyway? Crome is for those who want to polish instead of ride? Make your RT uniquely yours instead of "cookie cuter", AND.......Ride in comforthyea:hyea:hyea:.
John

 

[liebowa]

Another in the 1330 ACE camp.

I owned a 2011 RT-S and just upgraded to a 2014 RT-Limited. As mentioned several times above, some of the improvements over the 998 are:
- far better acceleration and smoothness
- six speed vs. five speed transmission
- better fuel economy - even without engaging the ECO feature
- redesigned engine airflow, so your right pantleg/boot won't melt during/after a ride (over-exaggerating just a bit, but they do throw a lot of heat)

I'm not knocking the 998 at all. That was a great machine and there are some deals to be had for those models, no doubt.

But, if you can swing it - seriously look at a 2014+, 1330 engine.

LOVE THIS ENGINE.

 

[Chupaca]

As I see it...

2010 to 2013 they were the V-twin 998 5 speed trans engine type from 2014 on they are the 1330 triple 6 speed trans. The 2010 had problems as it was the first and Joe public had not worked out all the kinks. They were ultimately all corrected and as long as all updates were done are good with the best being the 2012 jmo. I am fond of the twin but understand that if you are looking at the touring (plush ryde) you would be better off looking at the 2014 and up. There are many good deals out there but no doubt you will find greater ones on the pre 2014 models. As usual will come down to you but a test ryde on both may clear things up nicely for you....happy shopping...:thumbup:

 

[Highwayman2013]

Test ride and budget. Get the newest and lowest mileage one you can afford. My 2012 has been a great bike with a few minor problems covered by the warranty. Good luck.

 

[nasty]

rt 998?

have 998 2011rt, first one so I plumped for a cheaper start. just incase I didn't like the riding style, came from sports tourers, Honda vfr1200f which I still have, but so far after 3months really liking it, will swap out in about a year or for 2015 at least.
good luck with your pick.
cheers nasty

 

[Bob Denman]

Test ride and budget. Get the newest and lowest mileage one you can afford. My 2012 has been a great bike with a few minor problems covered by the warranty. Good luck.

:agree: The best judge: is YOU! :thumbup:

 

[PrairieSpyder]

:welcome:

I agree that the 2014s or newer are the way to go. Let us know how it ends up. And of course you must post a pic when you get a Spyder home.

 

[Jlbmpo]

What Fuel Mileage gain?

I have a 12 with no issues but if I was out looking again, like stated above, go with a 14 up for the 1330 engine. The 998 is peppy but the 1330 with the power gain and the fuel mileage gain is the way to go.

I've learned in a very short time that one thing I cannot pass on the Spyder is a gas station! I can hardly imagine what the "gain" would've been from...... What was the mileage BEFORE the 1330?

 

[Border Rider]

2011 and 2016 rt

I started with a used 2011 rt se5, loved it, got over 30mpg riding double. and really like the low end torque. Now we have a 2016 RTS.
40 plus mpg. I have seen a lot of issue's discussed with the 2014 rt's on this web site. The one thing I have noticed with our 2016 is BRP must have made some changes because it rides and handle much better.

 

[youngers]

what do you have now ?

if you are on 2 wheels , and are just shopping , go for not so expensive , when you find one , look in this arena { spyder lovers } and look at the comments for the one you are looking at , and judge from there ... { I just purchased a 2012 , S M 5 has the clutch on the handle bar } had a great time with it , but one problem , I had was the clutch , { you can look up 2012 clutch , and you can see what type of problems can be found , I repaired mine with a friend , took photos , and explained what was going on ... but do not be scared of the text you read , just do research ... } now why do I have a feeling you just found a 2014 r-t spyder ?

 

[Bob Denman]

I've learned in a very short time that one thing I cannot pass on the Spyder is a gas station! I can hardly imagine what the "gain" would've been from...... What was the mileage BEFORE the 1330?

My 2010 RT averaged 33.5 mpg.
My 2014 RT is averaging 38.5 mpg.

I regularly exceed 40 mpg; my 38.5 average includes a certain trip. taken at speeds that I don't talk about... much!

 

[ARtraveler]

I have both a 2011 and a 2014. The 2014 is my favorite with the 1330 three cylinder and six speed.

If money is not an object, the 2014 plus is worth it. Any other RT is a good choice. The 2013 RT heat issues have been fixed with air scoops being installed by dealers.

Its your choice. Let us know what you do. :yes: