• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Rverend Graham

Status
Not open for further replies.
sad news....

:pray:'s to family and friends.... he was all over the place for a long time and build up a following...
 
He was a truly inspirational world class religious leader in his time. Humble and sincere, he preached and lived the gospel of the New Testament. My father was one of millions that sincerely revered him. His was a message of love, redemption and inclusion. He will be sorely missed .

he was anti semetic & anti womens rights going back to his nixon years.
 
he was anti semetic & anti womens rights going back to his nixon years.
That was before the civil rights and women's rights movements caused people to rethink how their religious beliefs fit into modern society. A lot of things have changed in Christian churches since then.

Also, he wasn't anti-semitic and anti-women's rights any more than he was anti-black. Back then, all Christian churches taught and practiced beliefs based more on the Old Testament than the New. I remember my father, who was the kindest, gentlest man I've known, believed the bible taught that women were to be subjective to men and that non-whites were descended from Cain's branch of the original family and thus inferior (but still loved by god).
 
That was before the civil rights and women's rights movements caused people to rethink how their religious beliefs fit into modern society. A lot of things have changed in Christian churches since then.

Also, he wasn't anti-semitic and anti-women's rights any more than he was anti-black. Back then, all Christian churches taught and practiced beliefs based more on the Old Testament than the New. I remember my father, who was the kindest, gentlest man I've known, believed the bible taught that women were to be subjective to men and that non-whites were descended from Cain's branch of the original family and thus inferior (but still loved by god).

Let me get something straight. Your father's beliefs, stated above, at one point were based on the old testament, and then his beliefs changed based on the new testament? What about people whose beliefs were or are not based on any testament, but based on common decency? What a bunch of horse crap that people didn't have a mind of their own, and were led around by the nose based on what the church said, or what they are currently saying. How about not using the excuse I (he, she they) did what I did because that's what's in the bible, or was in the bible at a certain point in time?
 
Last edited:
Thoughts and :pray::pray: to family and friends. :bowdown::bowdown:

He was truly one of the "great ones." And, unlike some, he appeared to keep his faith and avoided scandals.

There are always some detractors. This is not the place for it. :sour:
 
Let me get something straight. Your father's beliefs, stated above, at one point were based on the old testament, and then his beliefs changed based on the new testament? What about people whose beliefs were or are not based on any testament, but based on common decency? What a bunch of horse crap that people didn't have a mind of their own, and were led around by the nose based on what the church said, or what they are currently saying. How about not using the excuse I (he, she they) did what I did because that's what's in the bible, or was in the bible at a certain point in time?
That's not what I said.
 
There are always some detractors. This is not the place for it. :sour:

You have the right to your opinions but if you are going to toot someone's horn be prepared to accept others' opinions that may differ from yours.

Although Graham lived a cleaner life, as opposed to the many religious charlatans out there, it still does not make his preaching valid or provable.
 
Although Graham lived a cleaner life, as opposed to the many religious charlatans out there, it still does not make his preaching valid or provable.
That's why the followers are called believers. There is no scientific basis for any religion and most practitioners don't claim there is, or feel the need to justify themselves on that basis.
 
You have the right to your opinions but if you are going to toot someone's horn be prepared to accept others' opinions that may differ from yours.

Although Graham lived a cleaner life, as opposed to the many religious charlatans out there, it still does not make his preaching valid or provable.

Both of you tend to disagree with me most of the time. No problem. :yes:
 
Please reference this short scene from the TV series "West Wing" from the so-called "book of truth". While 'President Bartlett' and the show are clearly fiction the Bible references are not. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3CPjWd4MUXs
I never called the bible the 'book of truth'. I wish more political leaders would call out the religious charlatans the way Bartlett did. All the references are from the Old Testament, (from which we get the Ten Commandments considered so sacrosanct by those who have obviously never read them) and supports my point that the Old Testament has no relevance to Christianity and only serves to confuse the issue. Charlatans preach everything but the Gospel.

Genesis, from the Old Testament, is where the creation myth comes from and should be considered as such by readers. But, since Christians believe that every word of the bible is the 'word of god', without making a distinction between Old and New, then they are compelled to somehow reconcile their New Testament-based beliefs in Christ's message of hope and redemption, with what they know can't possibly be true (Old Testament explanations of unfathomable phenomena).

Which is why I came to reject all of it, rather than struggle any more with the inconsistencies.
 
You have the right to your opinions but if you are going to toot someone's horn be prepared to accept others' opinions that may differ from yours.

Although Graham lived a cleaner life, as opposed to the many religious charlatans out there, it still does not make his preaching valid or provable.


Oh, they are definitely provable, but you have to die to see it! :ohyea:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top