RS-S 2011 new injector?

[docdoru]

 

[groundeffect]

Interesting find, Doc! Thanks for sharing. :thumbup:


So, with a bigger throttle body on the RS, the RS-S having a slightly smaller throttle body, what effect does this have, power/performance and fuel mileage wise on the RS (with the bigger throttle body)?:dontknow:


Cheers,
Dean

 

[NancysToy]

I still want real proof. BRP has screwed up such numbers before. This one is too easy to transpose or misread. A seven and one are easily mistale for one another at a glance. Then they do the metric conversion, and voila...a number that is wrong, but is taken as the gospel. Remember the supposed six foot wide spec for the RT? I will believe the difference when I see the side-by-side photos or the comparisons from actual measurements from a trusted source.

 

[jedd]

I still want real proof. BRP has screwed up such numbers before. This one is too easy to transpose or misread. A seven and one are easily mistale for one another at a glance. Then they do the metric conversion, and voila...a number that is wrong, but is taken as the gospel. Remember the supposed six foot wide spec for the RT? I will believe the difference when I see the side-by-side photos or the comparisons from actual measurements from a trusted source.

:agree: I'm in the typo camp here too. However if proven to be true the only reason I see to reduce T-Body size would be a little bit better throttle response. So we waitopcorn::dontknow:opcorn::dontknow:opcorn:

Jim:thumbup:

 

[IWN2RYD]

This has been brought up now a few times... Spoke to my dealer on it yesterday... Nothing officially confirmed yet. No one has had the need to disassemble an RSS and I am not volunteering ours :roflblack:hyea:

 

[Raptor]

I'm kind of thinking typo as well. HP and torque numbers are the same, so unless they remapped the ECU it would almost HAVE to be a typo...

 

[garganos]

I verified the specs with our specification sheets from BRP service. Both the RS Std & RS-S have the 57mm throttle body. What is listed above is deffinately a typo.

 

[docdoru]

I verified the specs with our specification sheets from BRP service. Both the RS Std & RS-S have the 57mm throttle body. What is listed above is deffinately a typo.

Thank you :thumbup:

 

[IWN2RYD]

Cool! Now what about this Octane change from 87 to 91 on the 2011's?

 

[Dochands]

deffinately a typo - clever. :roflblack:

 

[jedd]

deffinately a typo - clever. :roflblack:

:agree::thumbup::agree:

 

[KipDM]

no fuel change....

Cool! Now what about this Octane change from 87 to 91 on the 2011's?

just bought a 2011 Spyder RS-S (my first :spyder2: ) and it's book (an RS book, so not sure if there really is a diff book for the RS-S or if i was just given the wrong book) states to use 87 octane fuel at a minimum.
in cars i know going higher octane than recommended can cause knocking, is this true for cycles too? if you choose to go higher octane does it get ANY performance boost?

 

[bone crusher]

Cool! Now what about this Octane change from 87 to 91 on the 2011's?

Don't waste your money...you won't see a difference to justify the extra octane.

That's likely a typo as well...they should run a contest to see who can catch the most typos...get a free service or bike or something!

 

[NancysToy]

Higher octane does not cause knocking...lower octane can cause knocking.

 

[boborgera]

Higher octane does not cause knocking...lower octane can cause knocking.

:agree::thumbup:

 

[Yfactor]

:agree: