The factory can make it say whatever they want.
It's the Marketing People!
You're right.....it probably gets better than that.:dontknow:
My truck has the same thing and it's pretty easy to check what it reads and what it is.The factory can make it say whatever they want.
It's the Marketing People!
By all rights we should be running 91 or better in our Spyder now but they have retarded the timing so we could get away with 87. The fact that it requires 91 now making me think the timing is closer to where it should be and that should give you more power and better fuel mileage.I sure hope so because it takes 91 octane just like my harley.
I sure like the reg, that first spyder uses
By all rights we should be running 91 or better in our Spyder now but they have retarded the timing so we could get away with 87. The fact that it requires 91 now making me think the timing is closer to where it should be and that should give you more power and better fuel mileage.
I would not mine the 91 if we could get closer to 40 mpg even 38 would make me happy - Harley get 44 -46
I heard a couple of years ago about the MPG for cars & trucks differing from what the company advertised. They said something about the vehicle would get that mileage under "perfect conditions". I've never found "perfect conditions", but I do know when I follow behind Remmos towing our 5th wheel, I get awesome gas mileage!![]()
My truck has the same thing and it's pretty easy to check what it reads and what it is.
By all rights we should be running 91 or better in our Spyder now but they have retarded the timing so we could get away with 87. The fact that it requires 91 now making me think the timing is closer to where it should be and that should give you more power and better fuel mileage.
Those standards have been revised so that the mpg better represents real-life situations...I think this took place 2-3 years ago...numbers are more accurate now...
Yup--- they all went DOWN to reflect real-world use---- not sure if bikes had to follow the new rules (or any for that matter) or not???
It's not like a bike has a sticker with the EPA MPG ratings.....
I may be wrong but when you look at the three major differences between the engines, You should get better gas mileage
Compresion ratio is higher
Horse power is lower
Torque is higher.
The higher Octane is required for the higher compression. But when you add that with the above, you should get better MPG's
Correct--- the higher compression of the 'new' engine requires the higher octane. The specs also state they have tuned this 991 engine to reach maximum HP around 1000 RPMs lower than our 990's do.
Lower RPM's usually equates to higher MPG. But the extra 300 lbs is gonna eat that up IMO.
Bill is also correct about the different fuels. Here in Michigan there is a gas pipeline that runs from Chicago to somewhere near Detroit - It ruptured awhile ago near Jackson Michigan and caused a mess--- and gas prices to go up. It feeds all of the storage tanks for all of the various brands.
They really shouldn't be allowed to market higher octane gas as 'premium' in my opinion.