• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Quality Survey Part II

Quality Survey Part II

  • You feel problems with brand new Spyders are primarily due to faulty dealer prep and assembly.

    Votes: 50 52.6%
  • You feel problems with brand new Spyders are QC issues during manufacture

    Votes: 38 40.0%
  • You feel problems with brand new Spyders are mostly owner ignorance (newbie)

    Votes: 7 7.4%

  • Total voters
    95
  • Poll closed .

OldDog

New member
Quality Survey Part II

Please choose one:

1. You feel problems with brand new Spyders are primarily due to faulty dealer prep and assembly.

2. You feel problems with brand new Spyders are due to quality control issues in the manufacturing process.

3. You feel problems with brand new Spyders are due to owner ignorance only (newbie stuff)

Please be honest and objective

Thank You
 
Last edited:
Quality Survey Part II

Please choose one:

1. You feel problems with brand new Spyders are primarily due to faulty dealer prep and assembly.

2. You feel problems with brand new Spyders are due to quality control issues in the manufacturing process.

3. You feel problems with brand new Spyders are due to owner ignorance only (newbie stuff)

This should be a poll.
 
Although most of the issues ocurre in the factory, it is up to the dealers that the machine is in working order and preped up before customer delivery. QC involves the dealer since they are the ones that finish assembly and are instructed by BRP to test it before delivery. So it is a combination of 2 and 1.
 
Although most of the issues ocurre in the factory, it is up to the dealers that the machine is in working order and preped up before customer delivery. QC involves the dealer since they are the ones that finish assembly and are instructed by BRP to test it before delivery. So it is a combination of 2 and 1.

:agree:
 
Although most of the issues ocurre in the factory, it is up to the dealers that the machine is in working order and preped up before customer delivery. QC involves the dealer since they are the ones that finish assembly and are instructed by BRP to test it before delivery. So it is a combination of 2 and 1.

In my case the dealer would have not discovered the crappy persons work on the left side of the line that put my Spyder together unless the dealer had disassembled the bike then reassembled it which is not part of the assemble inspection process at the dealer.

JT
 
In my case the dealer would have not discovered the crappy persons work on the left side of the line that put my Spyder together unless the dealer had disassembled the bike then reassembled it which is not part of the assemble inspection process at the dealer.

JT

Agreed... but it is still the dealer's responsability to inspect (to a certain degree) the unit before delivery. However, anything found by the owner after delivery still needs to be addressed by the dealer. So I still say it is half dealer, half manufacturer.
 
Last edited:
Let me grab my asbestos britches here...
14_6_1.gif

I see a lot of complaints that seem to originate from:
The owners adding a farkle that had "unexpected results"... :opps:
One the extreme side...
A blowed-up engine (#3!), after a turbo was installed...
In the middle of the mess...
A different exhaust "causing" a lean condition, and backfiring
The milder side...
Extra lights killing off the battery

We just dont' know when to quit; do we?
 
I voted #2 because IMO, the dealer is the final station between the :spyder2: and the customer. A well prepped and test driven :ani29: should find any bugs that make the :spyder2: an unhappy experience for the new customer.

#1 comes in as a second choice for me. BRP did not come up with the ball joint problem/resolution until much coercion from the public. There were enough complaints initially that it was obvious to a lot of us, that there was something not quite right.

RE: paint issues--I also have the peeling on the front of my 2010 RT-S. Not a mechanical issue, but cosmetic, if I look at it close.
 
Ball joints = factory.
Oil over-serviced = ? Do they service the oil quantity at the factory or is it part of the set-up? :dontknow:
 
Agreed... but it is still the dealer's responsibility to inspect (to a certain degree) the unit before delivery. However, anything found by the owner after delivery still needs to be address to the dealer. So I still say it is half dealer, half manufacturer.

I found no fault with the dealer with pre-delivery inspection. You could not see the problems I found unless you removed the covers. The dealer very happily fixed everything and even went out of their way to find the parts in house and fix them while I waited.

I'm just saying everyone's situation can be different and no blanket statements like this survey asks will cover everything.

JT
 
I found no fault with the dealer with pre-delivery inspection. You could not see the problems I found unless you removed the covers. The dealer very happily fixed everything and even went out of their way to find the parts in house and fix them while I waited.

And we :clap: and :bowdown: dealers like that. The dealers that sell the :spyder2: and "nicely" tell the customer ":cus: you it's not our problem", give these machines a bad reputation.

I'm just saying everyone's situation can be different and no blanket statements like this survey asks will cover everything.

:agree:
 
Let me grab my asbestos britches here...
14_6_1.gif

I see a lot of complaints that seem to originate from:
The owners adding a farkle that had "unexpected results"... :opps:
One the extreme side...
A blowed-up engine (#3!), after a turbo was installed...
In the middle of the mess...
A different exhaust "causing" a lean condition, and backfiring
The milder side...
Extra lights killing off the battery

We just dont' know when to quit; do we?


But, the question is - NEW Spyders ;) :doorag:
 
Survey Objective

The intent of the survey is to gather information. Once a consensus is reached, if it can, a collective resolution strategy would be the next step. My idealistic objective would be to make the Spyder the most reliable, confidence inspiring, world class ride out there.



I'm trying out an ST Saturday if all goes well. I have to convince my wife to let me buy one. :banghead::roflblack:
 
Thing is, Many of the Problems, that rear their ugly head, do so after some time of ownership. That tells me that the factory has kinks to work out. I bought mine knowing that the Spyder had some inherit issues, such as and overly-sensitive Nanny, Drive belt vibration, etc. I feel it is a machine that is still being developed and dealerships can not be responsible for something that they know will happen. All they can do is make the proper adjustments prior to delivery and pray the owner listened to him or her upon delivery. I'm sure some dealers are out for the dollar and do not care. However, the continuing common issues that happen to all of us, need to be addressed at the factory to see if they can be eliminated. This forum is full of those issues. Possibly another Poll. Which issues can and should be addressed by the factory ??? Hey! Just Sayin.. I'm a happy owner who has had my fair share of issues... and with my Spyder Too !!! I might add, Both my mechanic and the dealership go out of their way to resolve issues and make sure I'm happy! I also thank BRP for such enjoyment and Peace. R & D need to keep on top of these forums and the problems can be "engineered" out.
 
Last edited:
Let me grab my asbestos britches here...
14_6_1.gif

I see a lot of complaints that seem to originate from:
The owners adding a farkle that had "unexpected results"... :opps:
One the extreme side...
A blowed-up engine (#3!), after a turbo was installed...
In the middle of the mess...
A different exhaust "causing" a lean condition, and backfiring
The milder side...
Extra lights killing off the battery

We just dont' know when to quit; do we?

Bob, good thing you put on those asbestos britches because I've got my lighter aimed in your direction! I think you see a lot more complaints about things that originated at the factory or by the dealer setup. I know that has been my experience.
 
Back
Top