• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Performance differance between the RT and the RS

seadog

New member
Just a little tech info!
RT Multi-point EFI system with 2 in. (51 mm) throttle body Power 100 hp (71 kW @ 7500 RPM)Torque 80 lb.-ft. (104 Nm @ 5000 RPM)

RS Multi-point EFI system with 2.24 in. (57 mm) throttle body Power 106 hp (79 kW @ 8500 RPM)Torque 77 lb.-ft. (104.3 Nm @ 6250 RPM)
 
Last edited:
Just a little tech info!
RT Multi-point EFI system with 2 in. (51 mm) throttle body Power 100 hp (71 kW @ 7500 RPM)Torque 80 lb.-ft. (104 Nm @ 5000 RPM)

RS Multi-point EFI system with 2.24 in. (57 mm) throttle body Power 106 hp (79 kW @ 8500 RPM)Torque 77 lb.-ft. (104.3 Nm @ 6250 RPM)


Makes looking into putting a RS 57 mm throttle body on RT something to look into if cam & valves are same and no other major changes would need to be made
Not much bolt on mod's out there that would give you 6 hp. I have put a larger throttle body on my H3 Hummer Alpha 5.3L with SuperChips Mapping
and performance was greatly improved..


Freebob...:doorag:
 
If that is the case then all the magazines and BRP website have it wrong. Im thinking not unless it can be proven wrong. Not to mention the manuals. The mapping is also different between the two. :dontknow:
 
Last edited:
Back
Top