bikerbillone
Well-known member
My observation is those who have saved a bundle by cutting the cord, be it cable or satellite, are the ones who were subscribing to a bunch of extras or premium services. Those of us who have tended to subscribe only to the minimums don't get any real savings without sacrificing content. For example, I dumped Dish satellite and saved about $60/mo. That savings was reduced by a subscription to Pandora to replace the music stream of Dish. But I don't get Discovery, History, Nat Geo, Fox, MSNBC, and so on. Fortunately I don't miss most of those since I seldom watched them. But I did have to sign up for the local PBS station membership, $60/yr, to watch many of the newer and/or better PBS programs.
You can save money by cutting the cord, but mostly only if you were spending it excessively to begin with! :thumbup:
For the record, I was not one of those that had foo foo 'premium' service, bare bones was my game, but still, I was not willing to contribute to the ongoing financial shenanigans of cable, Dish, etc. IMO, ya don't have be a 'premium user' to get fed up with cable, Dish, commercials every five mins, and financial manipulation, but as mentioned, that's just my opinion. Everybody has one. I totally respect anyone that chooses to buy into all the cable or satellite programs available.