NancysToy
Motorbike Professor
You make a good point, Jim. Really, my beef is with short-sighted writers in general. I don't particularly care what they have to say, and I never even read a review until after we bought a Spyder. That's not so for a great many people, however, who dwell on what these "authorities" say. I guess we all like our Spyders so much, we hate to think that anyone will be unfairly deprived of the joy (or pain) of trying one for themselves, just because they read a poor review in some magazine. In addition, I would hate to see a great product wither and die in the marketplace, leaving us all with orphans, when that product has so very much to offer.Ok, maybe I'm dense or something, but every time a magazine reviews the Spyder it seems like most of the folk here get their panties all in a bunch.
You bought it because you like it, what possible difference does it make what some mag flack (or anybody else) says about it? Are y'all just insecure? Or do you need the masses to validate your riding decisions?
As a former V-Strom rider I'm very familiar with people calling it ugly. I never let it bother me, especially when I was riding right on their butts in the twisties on their "superior" sport bike.
Not trying to pick a fight here, I'm really curious what the obsession with the Spyder in the press is?
-scotty