-
There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.
Need advice from onwers
- Thread starter rfm1992
- Start date
SpyderAnn01
Active member
That is a personal decision. I bought the SM becasue I'm old school and "paddle shifters" drive me crazy. Give me a clutch and gear shift and I'm happy. That said if you will be doing a lot of riding in heavy traffic or a lot of stopping/starting on hills you may really like the SE. There are many on here who absolutely love the SE. Good luck with your choice and :welcome:
Star Cruiser
New member
SE5
Hi Rick, I was just cruisin' around the RT forum because I am thinking of upgrading to the R/T. More on that later.
I currently have the RS with the SE5 Shifter. I can tell you there is a LOT of power and it is a much faster (and easier) shift than the clutched model. The only setback I have with SE5 over the Manual shift is that you NEED to put on th e parking brake because the bike still rolls in gear (because the revs have to go over 1,500rpm, or so to engage the drive train. The RT Model has the power Parking Brake so that is not so much of an issue BUT you DO have to set it every time you stop (at least PARK) the Spyder. Much quicker shift times though!
OK my question on the Same topic - so I don't think it is a "hijack" of the thread.
Do you think there is any reason NOT to get an RT yet? I was going to wait another year to let some of the "bugs" get ironed out. The mechanic, who I trust a LOT, where I get my RS serviced says that there has not been much in his experience in the last year. I am thinking of 2011 RT-S or if there are not available I will wait and order the 2012. Any major differences? I might save a few dollars on the 2011, but I don't think it will be significant as my trade in on my 2008 will be less next year as well. No trailer package for me, just the RT-S with SE5 Transmission. Looking forward to some opinions and honest feedback. My 2008 with Corbin Bags has served me well for three summers and 70,000+ km. Only a few more months of riding season left up here in Ontario.
Hi Rick, I was just cruisin' around the RT forum because I am thinking of upgrading to the R/T. More on that later.
I currently have the RS with the SE5 Shifter. I can tell you there is a LOT of power and it is a much faster (and easier) shift than the clutched model. The only setback I have with SE5 over the Manual shift is that you NEED to put on th e parking brake because the bike still rolls in gear (because the revs have to go over 1,500rpm, or so to engage the drive train. The RT Model has the power Parking Brake so that is not so much of an issue BUT you DO have to set it every time you stop (at least PARK) the Spyder. Much quicker shift times though!
OK my question on the Same topic - so I don't think it is a "hijack" of the thread.
Do you think there is any reason NOT to get an RT yet? I was going to wait another year to let some of the "bugs" get ironed out. The mechanic, who I trust a LOT, where I get my RS serviced says that there has not been much in his experience in the last year. I am thinking of 2011 RT-S or if there are not available I will wait and order the 2012. Any major differences? I might save a few dollars on the 2011, but I don't think it will be significant as my trade in on my 2008 will be less next year as well. No trailer package for me, just the RT-S with SE5 Transmission. Looking forward to some opinions and honest feedback. My 2008 with Corbin Bags has served me well for three summers and 70,000+ km. Only a few more months of riding season left up here in Ontario.
ARtraveler
R.I.P. Dwayne
Test driving both flavors may be helpful. Its a personal decision though, and I have had both kinds--and am currently ryding a SE5.
I could go either way on the next one.
I do not note any power difference from one to the other--the SE5 actually may be quicker--because you don't have to roll off the accelerator or use a foot shifter. Just crank it and push the shift actuator when you are ready to upshift.
I could go either way on the next one.
I do not note any power difference from one to the other--the SE5 actually may be quicker--because you don't have to roll off the accelerator or use a foot shifter. Just crank it and push the shift actuator when you are ready to upshift.
When I traded in my RS SE5 for my 2011 RT-S (E) the dealer owner told me I was getting every dime back on the automatic. It may cost more up front but it all comes back when you trade.
ymmv of course, but I did very well on my trade in.
I wouldn't have anything but the SE. I just works so well for me.
ymmv of course, but I did very well on my trade in.
I wouldn't have anything but the SE. I just works so well for me.
daveinva
New member
I got my license in a trike class on a Spyder RT-S manual.
I bought an RS SE5.
That should tell you my opinion
Honestly, price difference aside, my only concern with the SE5 was whether it would "disengage" me from the riding experience. I was disabused of that notion in my first dozen miles on the automatic. It shifts *faster* (paradoxically for those of us used to driving/riding standards), it's very smooth, and it's one less distraction from riding the Spyder in heavy traffic.
Yeah, it can be a bit quirky shifting at times, in particular if you don't keep the oil level up, but by and large, it's one of the more reliable parts of the Spyder, you won't find many owners with serious trouble with the SE5.
Believe me, it's good, and you won't regret it.
I bought an RS SE5.
That should tell you my opinion
Honestly, price difference aside, my only concern with the SE5 was whether it would "disengage" me from the riding experience. I was disabused of that notion in my first dozen miles on the automatic. It shifts *faster* (paradoxically for those of us used to driving/riding standards), it's very smooth, and it's one less distraction from riding the Spyder in heavy traffic.
Yeah, it can be a bit quirky shifting at times, in particular if you don't keep the oil level up, but by and large, it's one of the more reliable parts of the Spyder, you won't find many owners with serious trouble with the SE5.
Believe me, it's good, and you won't regret it.
Cyclist922
New member
It's very much a personal call. After riding a Burgman scooter (totally auto) for a few years I just wanted to feel a shifter over my boot again. Next time, it might be the SE.
granpa in Cincy
New member
The SM leaves a black mark on my white sneakers. :shocked: 
pps:
pps:Bob Denman
New member
SE 5 here and glad that I've got it... :thumbup:
Dragonrider
New member
Had a 09 RS SM5, and now have a '10 RT S SE5. Got the SE as part of the deal, and now prefer it.
Just put 1100 hard miles on the RT, without a hiccup, and will soon add another 2000 to the clock.
Just put 1100 hard miles on the RT, without a hiccup, and will soon add another 2000 to the clock.
Similar threads
