• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Leaning Right

They swear up and down it was the shock. It does seem like the service invoice mentioned a cap spring or something, but I may be wrong. I'll have to check later.


Maybe it was the wrong shock. I believe there are different lengths depending on the model.
 
How many of you know the real purpose of a shock absorber?b

Scotty, Finless, BajaRon and the other mechanical types are barred from stating the purpose or job a shock absorber on a Spyder is suppose to perform?
 
Last edited:
Scotty, Finless, BajaRon and the other mechanical types are barred from stating the purpose or job a shock absorber on a Spyder is suppose to perform?

That's pretty absurd. If you must know, a coil-over shock serves two purposes. The first is suspension...bearing the weight of the vehicle. That job is done by the spring. The second is damping...resisting the road and vehicle forces to allow the suspension to move in a controlled manner. That job is done by the shock itself. Unequal springs or damping on opposite sides (or ends) can make for an odd handling vehicle or an uneven attitude (stance).
 
Just for clarification, what is absurd. The shock does not support the weight of the bike. The spring does. And, as you have stated, this is a coil-over assembly. However, the coil spring is a separate piece that apparently can be removed and serviced separately. It could also be assembled incorrectly and cause the problem. Also, if the coil-over assemblies are not matched to each other, I would think that could cause the problem. I was really just curious as to what the root cause of the problem was.
 
Just for clarification, what is absurd. The shock does not support the weight of the bike. The spring does. And, as you have stated, this is a coil-over assembly. However, the coil spring is a separate piece that apparently can be removed and serviced separately. It could also be assembled incorrectly and cause the problem. Also, if the coil-over assemblies are not matched to each other, I would think that could cause the problem. I was really just curious as to what the root cause of the problem was.
What is absurd is that we would somehow "be barred from stating the purpose of a shock absorber." To be honest, I didn't really think it was such a mystery that it really needed to be explained. Apparently I was mistaken.
 
Back
Top