DragonLorD
New member
I'll stay with the RS until something sportier is coming out.opcorn:
:agree: :agree: :agree:
I'll stay with the RS until something sportier is coming out.opcorn:
The key word in Brian's post was "most". You see no advantage because you have no need. Brian rides with his wife as I do with mine and my wife rode over 40,000 miles with me on our 2008 SE5 which we traded on the RT. There is no right or wrong in his assumption. From the posts I have read, the beauty of the RT is the comfort it gives to our riding companions.
Unless there has been a poll of all RS/GS owners and more say they wish they had an RT, the word 'most' is incorrect. But, everybody is entitled to their opinion.
:dontknow:I wish the Holy 5 RT Ambassadors can just stuff it.
:agree: The RT, for me, just looses the bad-ass look of the RS. But if I was a long range rider I might change my mind as thats where most of the advantages are.Unless there has been a poll of all RS/GS owners and more say they wish they had an RT, the word 'most' is incorrect. But, everybody is entitled to their opinion.
One other comment... Once my wife rode on the RS she never wanted to be a passenger on it ever again.. Hence the reason we got the RT...
It's okay Bro, I wasn't sure what the question meant so I voted to stuff it.And for the three who polled that the Holy 5 RT Ambassadors should stuff it, it may be a good idea for you to take time to see what the 5 have done for the RT. Yes, the RTs were on a "loan" basis, but all the gas, maintenance, etc., was out-of-pocket for them. Besides, they were expected to write reports, do videos, etc., and report to BRP...all out-of-pocket. Would you have done it if asked? I would guess the costs per Ambassadors was near $10,000.
Besides all that they rode the RTs with a lot of faith. These models were pre-production models...anything could and did go wrong at anytime. Plastics fell off, codes popped up, switch pieces fell off. For the last year the Ambassadors have pointed out to BRP what was and was not working and BRP listened. Today we have better RTs because of them, and I would guess that a lot was also incorporated in the RS models as well.
Today we have better RTs because of them, and I would guess that a lot was also incorporated in the RS models as well.
:dontknow:
OK there's the poll. It is only for present RT owners since I know most RS owners would love to have the RT anyway.
I don't think the comparison of a svelte athlete and obese couch potato is fair or accurate. The RS is a sport bike and the RT a touring bike. I've had both and the RS while fun to ride for short distances is not as comfortable for me to ride as the RT. I am a tall and not obese woman and I am glad that I have the RT.
One of each works well for us!
CanAnn and Fast Fraser,
I think you both fixated on the wrong part of my post. I was making two points, that I guess I'll spell out much more explicitly before I hurt anyone's feelings. The first is my opinion of the dimensions. The RT looks much bigger and somewhat portly compared to the RS; again only my opinion. I'm sure you both have your spyders for a reason, and whatever that reason is, it does a good job satisfying your needs. The RT and RS both have different attributes and the post I was responding two was incredibly oversimplified. (See my other post for the quote.)
If you didn't like my post, I'm sorry, but take it for what it's worth. It's an opinion. I don't know either one of you, and I haven't polled owners of each type machine to determine any correlation between modern obesity standards and spyder preference. However, I know my opinion of the appearance the RT. It's a bit hefty looking.