ChevyBuickDealer
New member
I think one issue in this discussion is that some seem to feel that 'Minimum' and 'Optimal' are the same thing. Don't get hung up on the word 'Recommended' without considering the context. For example. A doctor may 'Recommend' that you not eat or drink more than 3 servings of a certain food type or beverage each week. When, in reality, not eating or drinking these things at all would be optimal.
Used to be vehicles gave optimum fuel octane recommendations for a particular application. However, things have changed now that everything is computer controlled. These days you will rarely see an 'Optimum' octane recommendation. Instead, manufacturer's give 'Minimum' octane requirements. But minimum means exactly that.
What the manufacturer is describing is the computers lower limit of ability to compensate for less than optimal octane values. If you run fuel at a lower octane than this 'Recommendation' you may exceed the ability of the computer to compensate. But the optimum octane value is almost always at least 1 grade, if not 2 grades above this minimum.
The computer compensates by retarding ignition timing. Which means the spark plug fires later than it would with the optimal fuel. So if you run less than optimal fuel, you may get less than optimal performance and fuel mileage. For many, this is not a problem. And that's OK with me too. It's just that accurate information is important so that everyone can make their own, well informed decision as what fuel to use.
Years ago I tested different octanes in a 6,000 mile trip to California and back. Running several tanks of one grade and then switching to another. I filled the tank to the same spot on the neck of the tank each time for accuracy. It took awhile to get the fuel to this point. But doing it this way meant a variation of only a few ounces between fill-ups. What I found was that I got at least 10% better fuel mileage with premium (92-93 octane) than I did with either regular or mid-grade. I really did not see enough difference between the lower 2 octanes to bother.
Ambient temperature seems to have something to do with this as well. Makes sense when you understand what octane does. The hotter the ambient temperature and the harder you are working the motor, the more octane makes a difference. This is why I said that you MAY get less than optimal performance and fuel mileage using less than optimum octane. Because in cooler or cold weather. Or being easy on the motor. The computer may not need to compensate for the lower octane.
Thank you for a sensible and accurate post!
The engineers of any given engine know how much cylinder compression, cylinder volume, how hot the spark is and when it is introduced for their particular engine. Therefore they tell the consumer what the minimum should be ran in the engine. Octane is only a measure of the fuel's ability to burn in a controlled manner as opposed to exploding uncontrollably under compression. Proper octane lets the combustion happen at the time it was designed to happen. Our Rotax 1330cc ACE engine (Advanced Combustion Efficiency) has a healthy 12:1 compression ratio. Higher compression ratio requires higher octane.
It is common knowledge everywhere in the motorsports world that higher octane is required for higher performance engines but higher performance is not always a given in every street driven vehicle using higher octane. It depends on the engine design and the technology of the vehicle's powertrain. Most mass produced performance powertrains in vehicle today have 2 fuel tables built into the software and computers are quick to make adjustments for the the fuel being burned. Bottom line...Just follow the Manufacturer's recommendations!
As for me I never run Octane below 91 (That is premium in my area) or any Ethanol in any offroad equipment/toys/tools or performance engine (mowers, chainsaws, weedeaters, ATV's, UTV's...) My performance engines are the CanAm Spyder, the Chevrolet Camaro, and the Yamaha YFZ. If you question why I consider the Spyder a performance vehicle then all you need to do is look at output in relation to engine size. At 1.33 liters it produces 86.47hp/liter. That's performance. That would be like your old 5.7L 350cid Chevy producing 493hp, your current gen Chevy 6.2L producing 536hp, your 5.0L Mustang producing 432hp, or your 6.4 Hemi producing 553. In reality the normally aspirated versions of these engine referenced produce less horsepower than these calculated numbers using our ACE 1330's output ratio. Why does Chevrolet, Ford ,and Dodge recommend 91 octane in their performance engines? The same reasons CanAm recommends 91 octance! But, ultimately it is each individuals choice as to what they choose to burn in their engine and luckily the manufacturers have designed them to handle both the 87 and 91 and above. They are both listed as minimum and recommended respectively.