I thought I could see where they're going: "Drew Brees, NFL player, is contractually prevented from riding a motorcycle... but the Spyder is a roadster!"
Instead, they do that.
I guess why is because the commercial opens up the Spyder to the ridicule of the motorcycling crowd that happily/eagerly/loudly proclaims that the Spyder is not a motorcycle because it doesn't have two wheels. But if that's the case, why invite the thought of the Spyder not being a motorcycle?
It's clear that BRP is chasing a younger demographic-- even if younger equals 35-65, i.e. people who aren't retired who don't want to hold two wheels up any longer.
But if *I* were in charge of BRP marketing, here's what I'd consider: I do more comparison commercials with the Spyder competing with other powersports vehicles. Don't force it into competition with motorcycles, brag about it as a *complement* to motorcycles... and dirtbikes, and quads, and snowmobiles, and jetskis, and hot-rods, etc., etc. Just another way to have fun out there.
You compete the Spyder against motorcycles, and most any young, image-obsessed rider who loves motorcycles will scoff at replacing their two wheels with three unless they have to. But showcase the Spyder as another toy in the stable of bikes, cars, sleds, etc., something uniquely fun, and you can start increasing their appeal to an audience where looking cool is unavoidably part of the equation.
Similarly, put a bike next to a Spyder, and send them both through rain, potholes, ABS emergency braking, etc. Showcase the "adventure" part of the Spyder-- when it's time to put away your bike, the fun is just beginning on a Spyder.