WaltH
Senior Member
Carlo called today in response to my inquiry regarding the change in part numbers for the rear wheel bearings. My curiosity on this subject is probably not shared by any other living person. I wanted to know what prompted the change. Carlo’s answer was that he did not know. However, he did say the specifications were the same, the vendor was the same, and “yes” they are still made in China. I have ordered a set of the “new bearings” which should arrive shortly. I will report on this at a later date.
In my email I ask about any change in functionality of the “cluster” caused by the recent software update. Carlo said the only change was the addition of an inactive fault code for the DPS in what is read out on the screen. My understanding is that other than this code, only active codes are available onboard.
Since I had the opportunity, I ask Carlo about the status of the investigation of the Spyder fires. He said that with respect to the fires which have already occurred the investigation is completed (case closed). Future fires will be reviewed at that time.
As I understand what he said, the conclusions of the investigation are as follows: There are no defects in the Spyder which could cause a fire. Since there are no defects, nothing needs to be changed. Since nothing needs to be changed, there will be no recall, and no recommendations will be made for the owners to do anything.
Carlo said “it was only a few fires”. In the context of our conversation, the implication was that going forward we could expect to lose some Spyders due to fires of unknown origin. However, he did not explicitly express the thought in this way. To continue to have fires of unknown origin will not be tolerable, if there is loss of human life.
I have been a strong supporter of BRP, and I feel they do much that is commendable, however, with respect to the issue of the fires I think they are making a big mistake. It is not reasonable to expect the fires to cease unless their origin is discovered and appropriate changes are made, no matter what those changes may be.
In my email I ask about any change in functionality of the “cluster” caused by the recent software update. Carlo said the only change was the addition of an inactive fault code for the DPS in what is read out on the screen. My understanding is that other than this code, only active codes are available onboard.
Since I had the opportunity, I ask Carlo about the status of the investigation of the Spyder fires. He said that with respect to the fires which have already occurred the investigation is completed (case closed). Future fires will be reviewed at that time.
As I understand what he said, the conclusions of the investigation are as follows: There are no defects in the Spyder which could cause a fire. Since there are no defects, nothing needs to be changed. Since nothing needs to be changed, there will be no recall, and no recommendations will be made for the owners to do anything.
Carlo said “it was only a few fires”. In the context of our conversation, the implication was that going forward we could expect to lose some Spyders due to fires of unknown origin. However, he did not explicitly express the thought in this way. To continue to have fires of unknown origin will not be tolerable, if there is loss of human life.
I have been a strong supporter of BRP, and I feel they do much that is commendable, however, with respect to the issue of the fires I think they are making a big mistake. It is not reasonable to expect the fires to cease unless their origin is discovered and appropriate changes are made, no matter what those changes may be.