jroberts650
New member
Just wondering if anyone here has tried putting a roller from Roadster Renovation on a BRP idler arm?
Just wondering if anyone here has tried putting a roller from Roadster Renovation on a BRP idler arm?
Just wondering if anyone here has tried putting a roller from Roadster Renovation on a BRP idler arm?
Why? .....unless you have the BRP idler already installed.
I have the BRP idler with 17,000 trouble free miles.
If you dont trust BRP then try Docs with his double bearing design.
If you going to buy Docs then buy the whole outfit from him.
Actually, we won't just sell the roller. You have to have our Vibration Damper to order a replacement roller. We check every roller order.
This are very specifically put together and that is why they are lasting as long as they are. We initially explored the possibility and decided that it would not be a safe thing to do.
Actually, you do have the roller for sale separately on your website. One with and one without the orings for the ribbed belt.
You have to have our Vibration Damper to order a replacement roller. We check every roller order.
Did you miss this part of his response?
He's a small time operator in the world of manufacturing. It's the best way to limit his warranty and legal liability. It's designed and built as a tightly integrated unit. He also locates the roller farther back than BRP does with a longer idler arm. He doesn't want there to be any risk of his roller running up into the gas tank.Seriously?! Why would he only sell the roller if you have his idler?
He's a small time operator in the world of manufacturing. It's the best way to limit his warranty and legal liability. It's designed and built as a tightly integrated unit. He also locates the roller farther back than BRP does with a longer idler arm. He doesn't want there to be any risk of his roller running up into the gas tank.
I understand that but what difference does it make what I do with it if I just buy the roller? I could be using it for anything just like anyone could use the idler for any custom application.
I'll see what Doc says about selling it to me without his idler and if he doesn't it will be his loss. I'll just keep what I have and take it off if it ever fails. The idler application is for annoyance and aggravation of the belt vibrating. It's not a safety aspect or defect of the machine. I don't have to have it, just thought I would ask if anyone has tried a conversion to make the BRP better.
Put yourself in Doc's shoes. You sell a product you designed to work as a complete assembly. A prospective buyer wants to buy a part of your product to use on application the buyer himself has designed. In this litigious world would you run the risk of making the sale of your component part and perhaps subject yourself to at a minimum being bad mouthed because your component didn't work the way the buyer wanted even though his use of it was not what your design intended? At worst, would you want to subject yourself to being sued for something that went wrong with a component that failed in the buyers use of it when it was designed to be used only in the manner intended on the complete assembly you sell. Sure, you might not bad mouth Doc if his roller didn't work on a BRP assembly, or sue him if his roller caused something catastrophic on your Spyder, but there are, in all reality some people out there who would sue. Why should he take the risk?
Wow, the vibration on the F3 or newer RT's, must really be bad for all of this conversation to take place.
I am so happy that I have an RT, would love to have an F3, but my 2013 RT is awesome. There is a very slight, I did say very slight, vibration in the 70's, but certainly nothing really that bad that I would spend $200 to alleviate?
For now I will just Ryde around on this 2013 RTL SE5 that purrs like a kitten, runs like a cheetah, corners like on rails, and just keeps on going, even though many of you "experts" warn people about how there is nothing good about this model, heck, I don't have any complaints and you guys do! Who has the problem model?
Not me!:yes:
Joe
The only "controversy" that I see here is that you emailed me about buying a pulley to modify and I patiently explained that it would not work on the BRP arm. I even went on to explain that their arm has a tendency to freeze up at the pivot point since the joint is not sealed like ours. You then brought this up in open forum here and have consistently tried to sway me from what I know is the right thing to do. The bottom line is that if you are unwilling to purchase a kit, this matter is closed as far a I am concerned. I will give you kudos for persistence, but it still ain't gonna happen.
That is the only "controversy" that I see.
The only "controversy" that I see here is that you emailed me about buying a pulley to modify and I patiently explained that it would not work on the BRP arm. I even went on to explain that their arm has a tendency to freeze up at the pivot point since the joint is not sealed like ours. You then brought this up in open forum here and have consistently tried to sway me from what I know is the right thing to do. The bottom line is that if you are unwilling to purchase a kit, this matter is closed as far a I am concerned. I will give you kudos for persistence, but it still ain't gonna happen.
That is the only "controversy" that I see.
I have to agree with Doc 100%. In this day and time its all about CYA.