Even before I took delivery of my Spyder SE #445 in Dec. 08 I purchased the special Gates sonic tension meter from my power trans equip supplier. I'm an engineer and quite anal so I knew I had to have this tool to satisfy my concerns about the belt tension. No little 'clicker' from NAPA would suffice!
Of course I measured the tension early on and found it to be much higher than many of us thought necessary. When I tried to re-tension to a lower value I simply could not get the belt to track just slightly away from the pulley flange. I tried jacking up the rear wheel and running in 3rd gear to 'dynamically' track the belt. I took it out for short test rides. Always, when I retorqued the axle the tension increased, sometimes more than 100N. Regardless of my method the belt always came to rest against the flange, though not climbing or marking it, so I figured this was the best I could do. When helping a friend with his belt, we got it to stay 1/8" off the flange. I even rode back up to Buffalo (240 mi each way) to the dealer who delivered it, to see if their guys could track it better. No luck.
Yesterday (with 12,800 miles on the clock) I loosened the belt to remove the front drive pulley so that I could replace the Gear Postion Sensor. I was extra careful to loosen each side adjuster, and I re-tightened them less by 1/4 turn. Once I retorqued the axle my tension meter indicated 820N, less than the 1150N from original adjustments. Took it around the block a few times and the belt stayed against the flange. Took a longer ride today, about 30 miles on the interstate, and when I exited I noticed that the belt was overhanging the outer edge of the rear pulley by about 1/4" - WTF! I have basic tools with me at all times, including a specially fabricated socket and handle for the axle, but decided to ride more slowly on a two-laner, and after a few miles the belt was back against the flange. Hopped back on the interstate and rode the 20 miles home - still against the flange. After the bike cooled down I rechecked the tension with my sonic meter - now it is 590N. How'd that happen?
I suppose it is OK now, and with lower tension and no more 'groaning' at low speeds. But seeing that belt hanging off the other side of the pulley really put me off. Any ideas why this would happen?
Thanks, Stuart
Of course I measured the tension early on and found it to be much higher than many of us thought necessary. When I tried to re-tension to a lower value I simply could not get the belt to track just slightly away from the pulley flange. I tried jacking up the rear wheel and running in 3rd gear to 'dynamically' track the belt. I took it out for short test rides. Always, when I retorqued the axle the tension increased, sometimes more than 100N. Regardless of my method the belt always came to rest against the flange, though not climbing or marking it, so I figured this was the best I could do. When helping a friend with his belt, we got it to stay 1/8" off the flange. I even rode back up to Buffalo (240 mi each way) to the dealer who delivered it, to see if their guys could track it better. No luck.
Yesterday (with 12,800 miles on the clock) I loosened the belt to remove the front drive pulley so that I could replace the Gear Postion Sensor. I was extra careful to loosen each side adjuster, and I re-tightened them less by 1/4 turn. Once I retorqued the axle my tension meter indicated 820N, less than the 1150N from original adjustments. Took it around the block a few times and the belt stayed against the flange. Took a longer ride today, about 30 miles on the interstate, and when I exited I noticed that the belt was overhanging the outer edge of the rear pulley by about 1/4" - WTF! I have basic tools with me at all times, including a specially fabricated socket and handle for the axle, but decided to ride more slowly on a two-laner, and after a few miles the belt was back against the flange. Hopped back on the interstate and rode the 20 miles home - still against the flange. After the bike cooled down I rechecked the tension with my sonic meter - now it is 590N. How'd that happen?
I suppose it is OK now, and with lower tension and no more 'groaning' at low speeds. But seeing that belt hanging off the other side of the pulley really put me off. Any ideas why this would happen?
Thanks, Stuart