Zenagirl
GOS member (Girls On Spyders)
Thanks Deborah!!!!:clap:
-
There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.
Anyone having problems with alignment on the new 2013 ST's ???
- Thread starter Zenagirl
- Start date
Thanks Deborah!!!!:clap:
DocRags
New member
Congrats on your new bike! If it helps any, Zenagirl, you should remember that there are thousands of us Spyderlovers out there and most of us have NOT had an alignment problem. Read over your owner's manual from front to back, watch the safety DVD, practice, practice, practice and ENJOY, ENJOY, ENJOY. Read the prior posts under "Do's and Don'ts for new riders"...lots of helpful info there. And post any questions you end up with...lots of folks with knowledge and experience on here that are always glad to help.
kubie
New member
I just traded my 2012 RSS in on a 2013 STS
I just traded my 2012 RSS SE 5 in on a 2013 STS SE 5.
I love it! I'm 6' 4" tall and was just cramped on the RSS. The STS fits me so much better with the Floor boards, the taller profile and higher handle bars and oh and the adjustable wind shield, it fits me Great. The Shifting Is greatly improved. And not having to man handle the steering is definately a plus. The sensitivity of the steering Freeked me out! I am having the same issues as the other Spyder Riders on this Board! it seams to wonder. I have notaced that a lighter grip helps. but don't know if that is the complete fix. does any one know if BRP knows about this issue. I really thought/think somthing wasor is loose or out of alinement. I only have 150 miles on it So im going to try and get used to it but I still think somthing is Wrong. wish I could dampin down the sensitiivity and see if that helped!
I just traded my 2012 RSS SE 5 in on a 2013 STS SE 5.
I love it! I'm 6' 4" tall and was just cramped on the RSS. The STS fits me so much better with the Floor boards, the taller profile and higher handle bars and oh and the adjustable wind shield, it fits me Great. The Shifting Is greatly improved. And not having to man handle the steering is definately a plus. The sensitivity of the steering Freeked me out! I am having the same issues as the other Spyder Riders on this Board! it seams to wonder. I have notaced that a lighter grip helps. but don't know if that is the complete fix. does any one know if BRP knows about this issue. I really thought/think somthing wasor is loose or out of alinement. I only have 150 miles on it So im going to try and get used to it but I still think somthing is Wrong. wish I could dampin down the sensitiivity and see if that helped!
Kungfuspyder
New member
Don't take it to heart
First of all congratulations on your new RT. I did have a problem with my 2012 RT, the owner of Hattiesburg Cycle had a problem with his ST, he only had about 3 spyders checked some were off some not nearly as bad as mine was. This dealer, as far I know only had this problem. It was up to this dealer to check the alignments at his expense. Not all new ST's have an alignment problem. I am sorry if I deceived you. Enjoy your RT, learn it, know how it functions, relax, enjoy it. The best experience, is your experience. I had talked with Scotty on the production of the spyders, they do check out them constantly on the line, correcting problems as they go along. I am very happy with my RT, I was unfortunate with the bad alignment. BRP did offer to have my RT checked out even after 6000 miles. If you have any problems with your Spyder, everyone here on spyderlovers will give you helpful info, the BRP people will listen and respond to you in time. I hope this helps.
First of all congratulations on your new RT. I did have a problem with my 2012 RT, the owner of Hattiesburg Cycle had a problem with his ST, he only had about 3 spyders checked some were off some not nearly as bad as mine was. This dealer, as far I know only had this problem. It was up to this dealer to check the alignments at his expense. Not all new ST's have an alignment problem. I am sorry if I deceived you. Enjoy your RT, learn it, know how it functions, relax, enjoy it. The best experience, is your experience. I had talked with Scotty on the production of the spyders, they do check out them constantly on the line, correcting problems as they go along. I am very happy with my RT, I was unfortunate with the bad alignment. BRP did offer to have my RT checked out even after 6000 miles. If you have any problems with your Spyder, everyone here on spyderlovers will give you helpful info, the BRP people will listen and respond to you in time. I hope this helps.
Last edited:
twain
New member
I thought I was the only one with this wandering bike issue. I traded my 2010 RS Tuesday and now have a tad over 600 miles on my new 2013 ST Limited. It is scary how it wanders even without wind. I am going to ask dealer to check alignment this week with 600 mile maintenance. If not an alignment issue is going to take some time to get use to more sensitive steering. Only other issue I have with ST is there is no glove box or any way to mount my RS tank bag.
OldDog
New member
How is alignment checked and/or confirmed at the BRP factory? The Spyder is shipped with the front wheels off, correct?
Questions to ponder.
Does the new more sensitive steering on the ST require a more deliberate learning curve?
Is there a real production issue with wheel alignment of which BRP is unaware?
How would static alignment change between the factory and the dealer?
Those that have ridden the ST have said it tracks like its on rails. All the promotion by the ambassadors has been very positive as to the night and day difference in the ride between the 2012's and the new 2013's.
What are the assembly steps taken by the dealer to confirm alignment?
Chin stroking time... :chat:
Questions to ponder.
Does the new more sensitive steering on the ST require a more deliberate learning curve?
Is there a real production issue with wheel alignment of which BRP is unaware?
How would static alignment change between the factory and the dealer?
Those that have ridden the ST have said it tracks like its on rails. All the promotion by the ambassadors has been very positive as to the night and day difference in the ride between the 2012's and the new 2013's.
What are the assembly steps taken by the dealer to confirm alignment?
Chin stroking time... :chat:
Zenagirl
GOS member (Girls On Spyders)
Good luck with your 600 mile check up!! I'm nervous about getting out on my ST-S when it is delivered this weekend, knowing it has really sensitive steering compared to the previous steering has me concerned and a little scared. Just going to take it really easy and hope I can get the hang of it before long. I sure don't want to be scared everytime I take it out. :sour: You, know, I had thought the ST-L came with a glove box as well, and thought that was really cool. I was disappointed to hear that it doesn't. oh well, will have to figure something else out. Happy riding! :yes:
NancysToy
Motorbike Professor
In modern factories, alignment is usually achieved by merely turning the rod ends in a specific number of turns. The robots that do the job may also check the rod length, but I don't think the actual alignment is ever measured. Not sure how this works with a more manual assembly system, but I doubt there is a check of the final assembly. I could be wrong. The dealer merely bolts on the wheels, he does not check alignment. Some don't even zero the steerings sensors on BUDS, electing to wait for the 600 mile service.
OldDog
New member
Shocks and alignment
I will state upfront that I am out of my element, but I want to ask those that know.
Am I correct in saying the shocks on the 2013's are not adjustable?
What is the median weight for correct alignment?
What is the load range of the new shocks?
Would weight below the median result in a toe out condition with the most weight on the outside of the rim?
Would weight over the median result in a toe in condition with the most weight on the inside of the rim?
Is alignment set with or without the median static load?
Am I mistaking toe in/out for camber?
Toe in/out would be along the longitudinal axis. Camber would relate to the vertical angle in or out. I think camber would be correct.
I will state upfront that I am out of my element, but I want to ask those that know.
Am I correct in saying the shocks on the 2013's are not adjustable?
What is the median weight for correct alignment?
What is the load range of the new shocks?
Would weight below the median result in a toe out condition with the most weight on the outside of the rim?
Would weight over the median result in a toe in condition with the most weight on the inside of the rim?
Is alignment set with or without the median static load?
Am I mistaking toe in/out for camber?
Toe in/out would be along the longitudinal axis. Camber would relate to the vertical angle in or out. I think camber would be correct.
Last edited:
NancysToy
Motorbike Professor
I will state upfront that I am out of my element, but I want to ask those that know.
Am I correct in saying the shocks on the 2013's are not adjustable?
That is correct, they are not adjustable.
What is the median weight for correct alignment?
The 2013 suspension geometry has been changed, so they may not have the same problem with the alignment changing as the attitude changed, that the earlier models (at least the RTs) do.
What is the load range of the new shocks?
Technically, it is the same as before, according to the specs. The spring rate is the equivalent, but the stiffness (preload) is no longer adjustable.
Would weight below the median result in a toe out condition with the most weight on the outside of the rim?
On an earlier RT a high front end attitude (from spring preload, aftermarket shocks, and/or a lightweight rider) tend to cause more toe-in. It seems to affect the RS less.
Would weight over the median result in a toe in condition with the most weight on the inside of the rim?
On an earlier RT a low front end attitude (from low spring preload, and/or a heavy rider) tend to cause more toe-out.
Is alignment set with or without the median static load?
Alignment should at least be spot checked with the normal rider/passenger/cargo load...but the prescribed alignment method calls for the Spyder to be jacked up with the front wheels removed, so the suspension is not loaded and it cannot be aligned with a normal load in place. The RT procedures compensate for loading the suspension, but the compensation is a constant.
Am I mistaking toe in/out for camber?
Caster and camber are not adjustable on the Spyder, and are pretty much fixed by the suspension geometry anyway, so toe-in is the only parameter of concern. Think of caster as the fore-aft tilt of the steering axis (kingpin angle or rake), camber as the lateral tilt of the wheels, and toe-in as how much closer the front edge centerline of the tire is than the rear edge centerline of the tire. Toe-in is the equivalent of cross-eyed.
We do not know the nature of any geometry or alignment issues on the 2013 models, if any, so it would be premature to guess at any solutions. This is nowhere to make assumptions. Let's just be patient and see what the factory, owners, and aftermarket manufacturers figure out.
Am I correct in saying the shocks on the 2013's are not adjustable?
That is correct, they are not adjustable.
What is the median weight for correct alignment?
The 2013 suspension geometry has been changed, so they may not have the same problem with the alignment changing as the attitude changed, that the earlier models (at least the RTs) do.
What is the load range of the new shocks?
Technically, it is the same as before, according to the specs. The spring rate is the equivalent, but the stiffness (preload) is no longer adjustable.
Would weight below the median result in a toe out condition with the most weight on the outside of the rim?
On an earlier RT a high front end attitude (from spring preload, aftermarket shocks, and/or a lightweight rider) tend to cause more toe-in. It seems to affect the RS less.
Would weight over the median result in a toe in condition with the most weight on the inside of the rim?
On an earlier RT a low front end attitude (from low spring preload, and/or a heavy rider) tend to cause more toe-out.
Is alignment set with or without the median static load?
Alignment should at least be spot checked with the normal rider/passenger/cargo load...but the prescribed alignment method calls for the Spyder to be jacked up with the front wheels removed, so the suspension is not loaded and it cannot be aligned with a normal load in place. The RT procedures compensate for loading the suspension, but the compensation is a constant.
Am I mistaking toe in/out for camber?
Caster and camber are not adjustable on the Spyder, and are pretty much fixed by the suspension geometry anyway, so toe-in is the only parameter of concern. Think of caster as the fore-aft tilt of the steering axis (kingpin angle or rake), camber as the lateral tilt of the wheels, and toe-in as how much closer the front edge centerline of the tire is than the rear edge centerline of the tire. Toe-in is the equivalent of cross-eyed.
We do not know the nature of any geometry or alignment issues on the 2013 models, if any, so it would be premature to guess at any solutions. This is nowhere to make assumptions. Let's just be patient and see what the factory, owners, and aftermarket manufacturers figure out.
Last edited:
Bob Denman
New member
Scotty,
Thanks for spelling all of this out! :thumbup:
Old Dog,
Great questions! :clap:
Thanks for spelling all of this out! :thumbup:
Old Dog,
Great questions! :clap:
duneside
New member
:shocked: WOW! I think I hurt my brain just reading that. Scotty you are:firstplace::bowdown:
cyclelover63
Member
I agree with most of the posters here...Just ride and enjoy your new bike...A person can imagine all sorts of things...Keep and eye on the front tire wear..If you are wearing your tires out in app 5,000 miles or so,then you probably have an alignment issue with toe..Mine wore out at 6,000 miles,I had it aligned,new tires installed,now have 5,000 more miles on the new tires,and no wear showing at all..No machine is perfect,and few of them give a person the sheer enjoyment and feeling of freedom a Spyder does...I would still have mine even if I had to replace the tires every 5,000 miles..:2thumbs:
