-
There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.
annybody switching for the f3
- Thread starter gabbman
- Start date
Yazz
MOgang Member
There's something for everybody. Different strokes for different folks. Whatever makes you happy is the thing you need.
Bob Denman
New member
Cool... :2thumbs:
Think "Sports car", and that'll get you in the proper frame of mind for them! nojoke
den1953
New member
Two Things
The two things about the F3 that appeal to me are: 1. The foot forward cruiser riding position and lower seat height that goes with it. 2. The 1330 Ace motor with six speed gearbox which is proven to be more efficient and while it has no peak horsepower advantage over the 990 twin it does have a much nicer spread of torque over a broader rpm range. Two things that don't appeal to me are: 1. Lack of space in the frunk, not a deal killer but leads to having to add saddlebags and maybe a topcase which cost extra. 2. The no trailer allowed restriction which would make packing for a long trip with a passenger difficult if not impossible. I consider adding a windshield less of a negative as I usually change windshields on bikes that already have them.
The two things about the F3 that appeal to me are: 1. The foot forward cruiser riding position and lower seat height that goes with it. 2. The 1330 Ace motor with six speed gearbox which is proven to be more efficient and while it has no peak horsepower advantage over the 990 twin it does have a much nicer spread of torque over a broader rpm range. Two things that don't appeal to me are: 1. Lack of space in the frunk, not a deal killer but leads to having to add saddlebags and maybe a topcase which cost extra. 2. The no trailer allowed restriction which would make packing for a long trip with a passenger difficult if not impossible. I consider adding a windshield less of a negative as I usually change windshields on bikes that already have them.
Bob Denman
New member
If storage capacity for extended trips is an issue; perhaps an RT would better suit your needs... 
den1953
New member
RT vs. F3
The storage on the RT is second to none and definitely hits it comfort-wise in everything but legroom for me. Highway pegs do a lot to alleviate that issue but the only problem with them is in covering the brake pedal. The second or whatever it takes to move your foot from the highway peg to the brake pedal could mean several dozen to maybe over 100 feet to get stopped depending on your speed. That brings up the ISCI hand brake, which I feel should be there if highway pegs are used. Between that and a BajaRon anti-sway bar the RT could be made near perfect for me. The F3, on the other hand has the footrest postion already there, no hand brake needed although floorboards would allow more room to move my feet around than on pegs which lock your legs into a fixed position. So in adding floorboards, a windshield, saddlebags and maybe a trunk I would be at or above the cost of an RT-S and well above a base RT. Cost-wise yes an RT would fill the bill much better as a two up tourer. My riding is about 75% solo and about 90% local rides within a 40 to 50 mile radius. Long trips two up just do not occur much at all. Maybe an RT would change that and maybe it wouldn't, depends on the wife. For the vast majority of my riding miles an F3 would work just fine, maybe without the floorboards or the trunk. There again, cost will be a major factor in deciding between the two, but only after I demo ride an F3.
The storage on the RT is second to none and definitely hits it comfort-wise in everything but legroom for me. Highway pegs do a lot to alleviate that issue but the only problem with them is in covering the brake pedal. The second or whatever it takes to move your foot from the highway peg to the brake pedal could mean several dozen to maybe over 100 feet to get stopped depending on your speed. That brings up the ISCI hand brake, which I feel should be there if highway pegs are used. Between that and a BajaRon anti-sway bar the RT could be made near perfect for me. The F3, on the other hand has the footrest postion already there, no hand brake needed although floorboards would allow more room to move my feet around than on pegs which lock your legs into a fixed position. So in adding floorboards, a windshield, saddlebags and maybe a trunk I would be at or above the cost of an RT-S and well above a base RT. Cost-wise yes an RT would fill the bill much better as a two up tourer. My riding is about 75% solo and about 90% local rides within a 40 to 50 mile radius. Long trips two up just do not occur much at all. Maybe an RT would change that and maybe it wouldn't, depends on the wife. For the vast majority of my riding miles an F3 would work just fine, maybe without the floorboards or the trunk. There again, cost will be a major factor in deciding between the two, but only after I demo ride an F3.
Last edited:
Bob Denman
New member
:shocked: You are sure going to have to do some serious head-scratching...
Good Luck sorting all of it out! :thumbup:
Good Luck sorting all of it out! :thumbup:
ARtraveler
R.I.P. Dwayne
You have enough points in favor of both that you may need to do a coin toss, or play "dealer roulette." (Take the one the dealer has in the color you like best)?
Here are a few more, just to make your choice "easier." :roflblack:
:ani29:: The F3 is going to make those who buy it feel a bit "younger."
:ani29:: The price, if you don't go to farkle happy, will be a bit less. If you decide to "dude" it up, you can spend as much or more than an RT.
:ani29:: Do you want a Charger or a Cadillac?
Bob Denman
New member
Jut for giggles; I went to BRP's website, and equipped an F-3 for touring...
I got to $29,100 dollars or so, and had to quit... :shocked:
I got to $29,100 dollars or so, and had to quit... :shocked:
ARtraveler
R.I.P. Dwayne
Jut for giggles; I went to BRP's website, and equipped an F-3 for touring...
I got to $29,100 dollars or so, and had to quit... :shocked:
BRP did manage to HD or GW it with all the possible accessories. I would not play that game again either.
They do have some very "snazzy" stuff though. :yes::yes:
Spyder Tony
New member
Hellcat...
A Charger for me. In fact, a Hellcat edition Charger. Something about 707 horsepower makes me salivate. This is why I put a deposit down on the "Hellcat" of the Spyder lineup...that torque and power had me at "HELLO"...
A Charger for me. In fact, a Hellcat edition Charger. Something about 707 horsepower makes me salivate. This is why I put a deposit down on the "Hellcat" of the Spyder lineup...that torque and power had me at "HELLO"...
hawkiii
Member
You are really going to enjoy the ride. I remember you telling me I was going to like it... you were right. I'm pretty sure you will enjoy it too. The throttle is a lot more touchy than the GS. Don't go burning up the back tire
Bob Denman
New member
:congrats: :2thumbs:
Similar threads
