• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

2016 Spyder Line up announcement at sturgis?

Can-Am responded on there facebook with this message "There is definitely something fun happening but it's all a surprise! Stay tuned for more info." I Cant wait to see the new lineup, hope there is a new updated dash for the RT :yes::yes::yes::yes:
I do hope that the dashboard is painted hint, hint, hint, on the new models maybe the RT's. Deanna
 
I think everyone here is missing the point. Each and every day, for the next 19 years, 10,000 (ten thousand) people will be turning 65 years old. Lots of those people ride Harley's. What better place than Sturgis to introduce the new line-up of Spyders. Remember, us Baby Boomers have lots of disposable income and I don't blame BRP for trying to gain a share.

From a marketing standpoint, this makes all the sense in the world . After all, I was 65 when I switched from two wheels to the Spyder. Of all the bikes I've owned, I've never had any reason to choose Harley, but the principal is the same. I would not be a bit surprised if Can Am has a presence there.

Pam
 
What time exactly does the 3K off the 2015 expire ?? I think the date is the 31st. Anybody know??
Wait until 1315 hours, 1:15 PM to buy a new Spyder Maybe ?
Oldmanzues
 
http://www.kbb.com/motorcycles/can-...-can-am-spyder-st-s-sm5/suggestedretailvalue/
Its Called Depreciation!!! My dealer has a 2014 STS SM5 for 14,999 and we think that's Great BUT in reality according to KBB its only worth That.
Once the 2015 F3's Get to October (When I will probably buy one) The Base Model $19,499 will only be worth about $16,499 So There Will probably be a 3-4 Thousand Rebate which Many think is Just Great BUT its Basically a Monetary factor of Depreciation. Going to be an interesting Summer as Sales In My area of the F3 are Not Good , Which is Good for Me?:yikes:
 
I got the picture of the 2016

Just saw this posted can anyone verify this? Hope link works. :dontknow:

https://www.facebook.com/2134236752...13423675240/10155861569395241/?type=1&theater

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 2016.jpg
    2016.jpg
    62.2 KB · Views: 697
I'm really hoping for a revamped ST with a supercharged 3.0 liter V6, but if they at least put a 1330 in it my wife's F3s' days are numbered. :yikes:

Now a dual sport Spyder....hmmmm.

Either way, I feel like Can-Am' market share is growing by leaps and bounds thanks to the F3 (just my impression, not based on any facts I can find). If that's true, they need to strike while the iron is hot with models that appeal to as many different kinds of ryders as possible.
 
One needs to look at this from the reality of BRP. They will A) build what they are capable of building at a profit, and B) build a unit that overcomes buyers objections.

This is why the slower than expected popularity of the F3 is somewhat of a mystery. BRP surveyed and asked those who were not buying a Spyder why not, what would need to change to do so, what their objections were, and the F3 really did address the majority of those objections. It should be a home run, but has not yet hit that status. Bikers wanted to see the engine, get rid of the plastic, to sit with their feet out in front of them, project a muscular image that looked less like a snowmobile or watercraft, have it feel more stable and less like you were going to fall off going around a corner. The F3 does all that.

What can BRP build at a profit? The 900 ACE engine now used in sleds and Spark watercraft would be easy, 90 HP, wide torque band, easy on fuel, lower cost.......but is this something that people would buy? Is cost truly an objection to buying a Spyder? Is it riding position? Is it the image it projects? Is it the way it feels, handles, and rides? Is it DQR (durability, quality, reliability)?

We all own Spyders so we are not really the ones to chime in on this. BRP needs to know how to sell Spyders to those owning 2-wheel bikes, or those considering buying a 2-wheel bike. Will the majority of Spyder owners be former 2-wheel riders, or will they be people who like the thought of 2-wheels but dislike the safety of them? These are the tough questions when you change the paradigm of what is the norm and introduce something so different. Nobody really knows what they want......maybe there is no single silver bullet, just a bunch of smaller nuggets to be found?

The fact of the matter is the RT line is the biggest seller by a long ways. Appeals to an aging demographic with plenty of disposable income. New models are a calculated risk, a new RT is always going to sell. So, how many years between new versions? 3-4-5? Last new one was how long ago?
 
There's a lot of disabled riders out there, me being one of them. I'd sure like to see Spyder consider these riders as they design new models. There a few very simple things like a factory hand brake and a parking park control which could be relocated and made a hand operated brake. Make the fuel cap accessible without having to get off and fight with a seat to get to it.
I know a lot of disabled riders are staying on trikes for these reasons and the changes would not take away from everyday rider........ Just my thoughts


Jim
 
INTERESTING INFO

One needs to look at this from the reality of BRP. They will A) build what they are capable of building at a profit, and B) build a unit that overcomes buyers objections.

This is why the slower than expected popularity of the F3 is somewhat of a mystery. BRP surveyed and asked those who were not buying a Spyder why not, what would need to change to do so, what their objections were, and the F3 really did address the majority of those objections. It should be a home run, but has not yet hit that status. Bikers wanted to see the engine, get rid of the plastic, to sit with their feet out in front of them, project a muscular image that looked less like a snowmobile or watercraft, have it feel more stable and less like you were going to fall off going around a corner. The F3 does all that.

What can BRP build at a profit? The 900 ACE engine now used in sleds and Spark watercraft would be easy, 90 HP, wide torque band, easy on fuel, lower cost.......but is this something that people would buy? Is cost truly an objection to buying a Spyder? Is it riding position? Is it the image it projects? Is it the way it feels, handles, and rides? Is it DQR (durability, quality, reliability)?

We all own Spyders so we are not really the ones to chime in on this. BRP needs to know how to sell Spyders to those owning 2-wheel bikes, or those considering buying a 2-wheel bike. Will the majority of Spyder owners be former 2-wheel riders, or will they be people who like the thought of 2-wheels but dislike the safety of them? These are the tough questions when you change the paradigm of what is the norm and introduce something so different. Nobody really knows what they want......maybe there is no single silver bullet, just a bunch of smaller nuggets to be found?

The fact of the matter is the RT line is the biggest seller by a long ways. Appeals to an aging demographic with plenty of disposable income. New models are a calculated risk, a new RT is always going to sell. So, how many years between new versions? 3-4-5? Last new one was how long ago?

:agree:....As usual you seem to have your finger on the pulse with your comments......On the survey to find out what people want thing....the a problem in this area is people often give their opinion on what they think sounds attractive , however they may not be people who intend to actually spend any MONEY on the PRODUCT.......even if you preface the survey with " HOW LIKELY ARE YOU, TO BUY THIS PRODUCT ", people mis-lead ( LIE ) all the time..........Personally, I think BRP will make lots of money with the F-3......When the Spyder was introduced it exactly wasn't a HIT, numbers wise. But I think it's popularity is growing and will continue to do so.........I do think BRP is really RE-MISS and missing out on a lot of SALES because they don't offer a HANDBRAKE. There are a lot of Physically challenged people who would love to be able to try the Spyder or continue motorcycling and their options are few.......Mass production brings the manufacturing costs way down, and I think they would sell this option to way more than ONLY PEOPLE WHO MUST HAVE THEM..........Mike :thumbup:
 
sledmaster

Based on someone visiting spyderlovers.com to see what it is all about, I believe they are left with an impression of a vehicle based on an aging population with various models offered to match their physical abilities. All you have to do is visit one day, and listen to all the aches, and pains, and all the complaints based on their age. That is my take on it. So, you won't see any big age shift anytime soon, or any shifting of those already on 2 wheels that don't have much in the way of physical complaints.

Also, a few years back, BRP tried to overcome their image of spyders for an aging population with a video shown a younger demographic on spyders. And, it was an excellent video; but, I don't think it helped that much. JMO
 
Last edited:
Ahhh

From a marketing standpoint, this makes all the sense in the world . After all, I was 65 when I switched from two wheels to the Spyder. Of all the bikes I've owned, I've never had any reason to choose Harley, but the principal is the same. I would not be a bit surprised if Can Am has a presence there.

Pam

You shouldn't be as Lamont just told us he was going to be there with BRP for the announcement and leading a Ryde from the demo area on Saturday!:yes:
 
There's a lot of disabled riders out there, me being one of them. I'd sure like to see Spyder consider these riders as they design new models. There a few very simple things like a factory hand brake and a parking park control which could be relocated and made a hand operated brake. Make the fuel cap accessible without having to get off and fight with a seat to get to it.
I know a lot of disabled riders are staying on trikes for these reasons and the changes would not take away from everyday rider........ Just my thoughts


Jim

Even without disabilities I'd like a factory hand brake. I will say the F3 has the gas cap and electric (hand) parking brake control you're looking for. Minor thing for me but it's much nicer than the foot pedal and hidden gas cap. I am surprised the F3 doesn't sell better as it's a massive improvement over the RS (at least by me).
 
I still wonder why no one thinks of the possibility of 2 wheels. I guess I'm alone on this thought.


Sempert out,
 
When we were at Spyderfest, one of the Can Am directors (he was in the picture for the delivery ceremony) and a photographer were out walking around the parking lot taking pictures and asking owners questions about their Spyders. He said that BRP was looking to pull their new model year announcements (and initial deliveries!!) earlier in the year, more in line with what the car manufacturers do. So this appears to be in line with that statement. I suspect they realized that they can get more excitement for the new models if they're first available at some other time than the dead of winter in the northern tier states and Canada. I'm looking forward the announcement!

That makes sense to me. :thumbup: They have always announced after the end of the current riding season. Then there is this long wait until Spring before many dealers get the new models in and start selling them. By then, much of the excitement can wan.
 
Back
Top