• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

2014 Spyders: Classified Top Secret

You could see one and not know it

OEMs will often test next year's models with black body work, or even last year's body work but all of the new stuff underneath. That means you could come across one but never even know it unless you were really keen. The other thing is they are likely testing in an area where there are few "smart" eyes around. This is very common with the new sleds each year, so I would suspect Spyders would be not much different. One of the tell-tale signs is often the registration, what kind of plate does it have. But if they are testing right out of Valcourt and most everyone in that area has a family member that works at the factory, even if they see one they're not going to snap a photo and post it. Bad form.

So to increase sales, do they entice new buyers or give current owners a reason to upgrade? As for using the ACE 600 engine from a snowmobile, would 60 HP be enough? That is the engine being used along with an electric motor in the hybrid version, but would they could they use that engine as a stand-alone entry level model? How many more units could they sell with a 60 HP engine at a lower price? I don't see that one coming. How about using the ACE 900 three cylinder, that makes 90 HP and is silky-smooth, but would it fit? That might make a nice entry level model, but I doubt that engine is less expensive to produce so I don't see that one coming either.

Maybe a more powerful Spyder? Now that would drive the nanny crazy, even more power. Tough to predict. The Type 991 engine has a flatter and smoother powerband than the original Type 990, so would they give us a more powerful version for the heavier RT but maintain a smooth linear powerband? The RT is where all of the sales are at, percentage wise, so this is where the changes would be most logical. Food for thought.
 
Last edited:
I would agree with you; but so many of the 2013 issues directly involve the bodywork... They would have HAD to have been testing it with only enough cosmetic modifications to confuse the curious... :dontknow:
 
Do you mean something smaller, lighter, and powered by the Ace 600 engine? :dontknow:
HI Bob: I mean an entry level :spyder2: and a smaller engine ( less CC's maybe 650cc's). Maybe go for younger crowd. Just have to wait and see. Deanna777:ohyea::ohyea:
 
It will be more years before they make any major changes. IMO they missed with the ST. It does not take a lot of imagination to place one model between two others. A different riding position, motor options, or a drastic new body design are things we might get to see in a couple years. I am holding out hope for another company to enter the market and actually bring competition.

Just sayin'...........
 
HI Bob: I mean an entry level :spyder2: and a smaller engine ( less CC's maybe 650cc's). Maybe go for younger crowd. Just have to wait and see. Deanna777:ohyea::ohyea:
They've got the ACE 60 sitting on deck... :thumbup:

I'm not sure how much smaller you could make the bikes; you need the width for "Nannyless" stability...
Perhaps a CVT drivetrain, no frunk up front, and solo seating could shorten it up a bit! :dontknow:
 
I don't think smaller is a problem. The Chinese clones are 250 cc's. People are willing to spend about $5K for them. Probably not an all day on the freeway machine--but okay for a commuter.
 
They've got the ACE 60 sitting on deck... :thumbup:

I'm not sure how much smaller you could make the bikes; you need the width for "Nannyless" stability...
Perhaps a CVT drivetrain, no frunk up front, and solo seating could shorten it up a bit! :dontknow:
I still would like to see the frunk up front. i dont think BRP shouldn't shorten the up the seating on the RT's. They should have a 8 gallon gas tank. Maybe having a pushbutton gas tank release button. Deanna777:ohyea:
 
Tupperware issues

so many of the 2013 issues directly involve the bodywork..... :dontknow:


The bodywork on the 2013s (RS & ST) is basically the same as what we had for 2008-2009-2010-2011-2012 so do those older models also have the same heat issues, or is there something different on the 2013s that now renders the bodywork as flawed?

I assume the purpose of the bodywork is to insulate or better isolate the rider from the heat of the engine, agreed? And we indeed need to separate the issue of heat being an inconvenience and that of being a safety issue. As stated many times before, we are sitting on a heat pump so there will be heat, and the bodywork just tries to reduce this inconvenience.

But when we get to critical systems (brake master cylinders, fuel evap canisters) melting and posing a safety hazard, then yes there is cause for alarm.

So back to the question, has the bodywork been flawed since 2008, or what changes have been made to the 2013s that now make the bodywork inadequate?

Why are the 2013 ST and RT models being recalled, but not the RS? Is the ST more like the RT under the Tupperware? The RS and ST have the same bodywork, so why not the heat issues on the RS like the ST? The RS has the same CAT location as the ST for 2013 and the same bodywork, so I do not yet get why the RS would not be recalled as well. Please fill in the blanks!
 
YOur guess is as good as mine... :dontknow:
I'd guess that the GS/RS bodywork is actually signifcantly different when it comes to airflow underneath it...
The 2013 RTs and Sts were recalled because they were MELTING stuff! The RS models simply do not appear to be affected.

Show me a report of an RS with a melted brake master cylinder or evaporative canister...
 
Exactly

That is exactly what doesn't seem to add up. I'm not aware of any reports of things melting on the RS models, but if they have the same bodywork and CAT location as the STs then what is the difference.....I tend to agree with you, the airflow underneath must be different. Has to be. But then the airflow IS different on the RTs and they are part of the recall....it will be very curious to see what BRP does for the 2014s, can hardly wait!
 
Actually, their bodywork differs a little bit...
A couple of days ago; it was pointed out the the RS body has an opening in it that lets hot air escape. This opening in closed up on the Sts...
 
2013 was the big change, newly designed frame. Hard to imagine they will have a bigger change right away. Maybe they ship with the heat shield's in place to prevent the meltdowns. :dontknow:

Other than that, a new color or 2. ho-hum
 
:shocked: Tick... Tick... Tick... :shocked: :bbq::bbq:
Do you think that Sunday night will produce a new record for the most members online and in here at once? :dontknow:
(We're gonna need a lot of pizza nad beer for the crowd!)
 
Last edited:
Hi,

Please BRP do not touch anymore the Spyder just fix the already problem. Everytime you work on new Spyder you put more problem.:roflblack:
 
Back
Top