I can pick up either a 2012 or 2014 RRS. The '14 is a demo and has approx $2000 of options plus warranty for a year. BUT it will cost me an extra $7000. Is it worth it. The mods are pipes and some other cosmetics I likely wouldn't do so if I buy the '12 I would have a lot of $ to play with. Both have very similar mileage of only 2000 mi. I guess I am wondering if the model changes and warranty is worth $7000
-
There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.
2012 vs 2014 RRS
- Thread starter Gcclubs
- Start date
BikerDoc
New member
I am assuming you mean RSS.. with that in mind the 2012 would be a good deal most likely. There have not been many changes to that portion of the product line in recent years.
Only issue is warranty. I own two Spyders now and have owned two others. I would never own one out of warranty since a repair on them is usually significant.. Of course you could take part of that $7000 and buy a nice extended warranty as a possibility
Only issue is warranty. I own two Spyders now and have owned two others. I would never own one out of warranty since a repair on them is usually significant.. Of course you could take part of that $7000 and buy a nice extended warranty as a possibility
Chupaca
New member
Choices choices..!!
2012 was a good year. The changes were mostly color, an extreemly heavy cat and pipe system and probably other odds and ends not worthy of the price. If the difference is as you say..you can make that 12 do, act, look and be all the 14 thinks it is. I think you even get a bit more power with the 12...still your call..:thumbup:
2012 was a good year. The changes were mostly color, an extreemly heavy cat and pipe system and probably other odds and ends not worthy of the price. If the difference is as you say..you can make that 12 do, act, look and be all the 14 thinks it is. I think you even get a bit more power with the 12...still your call..:thumbup:
otter28169
New member
The 2012 is the last year of the 106hp motor. The next year they were 100hp. It is a minor difference, much like the rest of the RS-S changes between 2012 and 2014. The good news is they realized the can am red and matte black was a great color combo and brought it back :2thumbs:
I would definitely buy the 2012. I have over 30,000 miles on mine with minimal issues (all of which I caused), and have never had it throw codes or go into limp mode. As a matter of fact, I think that if you flog it regularly you will have fewer problems with your spyder.
Just sayin'...........
I would definitely buy the 2012. I have over 30,000 miles on mine with minimal issues (all of which I caused), and have never had it throw codes or go into limp mode. As a matter of fact, I think that if you flog it regularly you will have fewer problems with your spyder.
Just sayin'...........
I understand they switched to 15" rims and modified some suspension parts. Any thoughts if these changes make a noticeable difference for average riding?
Ah, good points.
IMHO, very subtle changes.
-15" wheels, no.
-Shocks, yes but easy/cheap to swap on the 12'.
-Frame/suspension geometry changes, I've noticed no difference riding.
-Brakes are supposed to be better but in riding them back to back I couldn't tell the difference. Maybe more noticeable on the heavier RT?
Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
Last edited:
Michael211_2000
New member
Huh? What do you mean by "flog"? :dontknow:
(Maybe I just saw "50 Shades of Grey" too recently... lol!)
- Michael
Tazzel
New member
I would go with the 2012. That is what I had and never had a problem and for about 2k you can make it better then the 2014. I liked the throttlemeister for cruise better than I like the BRP cruise control. On my 2012 RS I had the elka shocks, swaybar w/metal links, throttlemeister, 23inch BRP windshield, HID headlights, Ultimate seat. All done for under 2k. If it does not have the exended warranty but you can still get one, this would cost you around 700.00. However if you cant get the warranty then you would have to decide if you want to purchase one without it.
Also the 2012 was still a hot bike on days 85 and up in stop and go traffic. I believe the 2014 have different airflow panels and that would be another 500.00 if you want those but all is way under 7k
Also the 2012 was still a hot bike on days 85 and up in stop and go traffic. I believe the 2014 have different airflow panels and that would be another 500.00 if you want those but all is way under 7k
New Owner
After many weeks of looking and considering I have gone with a low mileage 2012 RSS. it is bone stock and now the mods start. For me half the fun is the tinkering I do. I was tempted by the 2014 but felt I couldn't justify the extra coin as the majority of changes I plan to make would also have been done on the bike to make more sport touring. Look forward to getting to know many of you
After many weeks of looking and considering I have gone with a low mileage 2012 RSS. it is bone stock and now the mods start. For me half the fun is the tinkering I do. I was tempted by the 2014 but felt I couldn't justify the extra coin as the majority of changes I plan to make would also have been done on the bike to make more sport touring. Look forward to getting to know many of you
greatrides
New member
Great choice
My first was 2012 rs with a couple speed parts!! I put 35000 miles on it and should have never traded it in. You will love it and dont be afraid to ride it..slow or fast!:thumbup:
My first was 2012 rs with a couple speed parts!! I put 35000 miles on it and should have never traded it in. You will love it and dont be afraid to ride it..slow or fast!:thumbup:
Bob Denman
New member
The '12 is a "throttle by Cable", 106 horse machine...The '14 is the "Throttle by Wire" 100 horse setup.
The '14's engine delivers more torque at about 750 rpm lower than the '12. That might make for a more forgiving powerband...
The chassis...
The 2014 has the new chassis with a revised front suspension, bigger wheels, and MUCH better Brembo brakes... :thumbup:
Your money: your choice...
2012 RSS, do you still have it and are you happy with it?
As you bought one way back when yours was three years old, I’m considering buying one now that’s six years old but with low mileage. I often wonder at all these Spyders with low mileage’s, I’ve ridden over a million miles on an assortment of bikes during the last 40 years and I easily knocked up forty and fifty thousand a year. Why are there still so many with so few miles?
I’m considering buying a 2012 RSS paddle steamer and I’m wondering if they are reliable and if there have been many recalls with them? Having broken my knee recently and it’s slow recovery due to an aging body I’m wondering if it will be a good choice for me.
Many thanks
Dubliner in BC
As you bought one way back when yours was three years old, I’m considering buying one now that’s six years old but with low mileage. I often wonder at all these Spyders with low mileage’s, I’ve ridden over a million miles on an assortment of bikes during the last 40 years and I easily knocked up forty and fifty thousand a year. Why are there still so many with so few miles?
I’m considering buying a 2012 RSS paddle steamer and I’m wondering if they are reliable and if there have been many recalls with them? Having broken my knee recently and it’s slow recovery due to an aging body I’m wondering if it will be a good choice for me.
Many thanks
Dubliner in BC
