$10K Spyders for 2019

[F650624]

2019 Project S

There were 2 BRP reps (2 guys that said they were BRP) at the recent "Spyders in the Hills" event in Boerne, TX. Both would say that BRP was going to announce a sub-$10,000 Spyder in late 2018. The new Spyder would be for around town and short commuter ryders. Both said exactly the same thing about the price and intended use. It was as if they were quoting from the same script, and that is all that they would say. Government beaurocrats should take lessons from the BRP reps on how to keep a secret. Rotax does have a multitude of engine/transmission combinations already in production. Many of these have been around long enough to have reduced their design, production and emissions testing costs. Anything we discuss here is simply conjecture.

 

[Bob Denman]

We'll all have to keep our eyes peeled, and hope that someone comes across a "Spy-Shot" from the motorcycling press... ray:

 

[ARtraveler]

:bbq::bbq::bbq:

Time will tell. BRP has done a good job so far of keeping a lid on actual information and specs. So far, we only know the price point.

All the information above is speculation, but IMO--pretty close to being in the ballpark. Removing 1/2 to 1/3 of the "fluff" from either the RT or the F3 is going to leave a pretty basic machine.

BRP is looking for a younger market and hoping they can get them to "upgrade" to whatever will be offered at a later time. Will it work? Time will tell.

I have driven enough MC's over the years, that an entry level bike is way out of my desires. I have become to familiarized with the Cadillac type ride. My new 900cc, $7K Vulcan is about as "basic" as I am willing to go. I know that I can jump on that one and drive anywhere in the US, safely, happy, and comfortable.

I am still an RT fan. My 2014 RT-S is not going anywhere. I feel the same about it too. :yes::yes:

 

[Bob Denman]

:agree: Time will tell the tale...

 

[Deanna777]

I hear that the dealers have been told a $10K Spyder is coming in 2019. I'm hearing on a different platform than either the F3 or RT. I know no details or even what is true/not true.. Those that do can reply and enlighten us all.

Rob

I heard the same thing, $10K for a spyder in 2019.

Deanna

 

[Deanna777]

:bbq::bbq::bbq:

Time will tell. BRP has done a good job so far of keeping a lid on actual information and specs. So far, we only know the price point.

All the information above is speculation, but IMO--pretty close to being in the ballpark. Removing 1/2 to 1/3 of the "fluff" from either the RT or the F3 is going to leave a pretty basic machine.

BRP is looking for a younger market and hoping they can get them to "upgrade" to whatever will be offered at a later time. Will it work? Time will tell.

I have driven enough MC's over the years, that an entry level bike is way out of my desires. I have become to familiarized with the Cadillac type ride. My new 900cc, $7K Vulcan is about as "basic" as I am willing to go. I know that I can jump on that one and drive anywhere in the US, safely, happy, and comfortable.

I am still an RT fan. My 2014 RT-S is not going anywhere. I feel the same about it too. :yes::yes:

I am also a fan of the RT, and my 2014RTS-SE6 is not going anywhere.

Time will tell on what the 2019Spyders will look like, we will all have to wait and see!

Deanna

 

[ARtraveler]

I probably missed an earlier post or announcement, but I saw someone mention they are waiting for the 2019s at $10K.

Can someone fill fill me in on what Spyders would be available for that price?

REF: Probably the original post & reply you are referring to.



All good advice above. Since there have been beemers in the garage, I don't think a second :spyder2: will be an issue. Those 2019 $10K prices should not be an issue. :roflblack::roflblack:

Enjoy, and continue to ride. Here is to many miles and smiles. or :cheers::cheers:

 

[Sarge707]

As someone who went from a 255HP Supercharged Sea Doo RXT-X to a 90 HP Sea Doo Spark I can tell you this-
The 255HP took 16 Gallons in 2 Hours going 65 MPH- Where the Spark Goes 3 Hours at 50 MPH for 6-7 Gallons?
The Spark is actually More fun because it is SO Manuverable and the 3 cylinder ACE 900 engine puts out 90 HP which is What they could use for the Economy Spyder? nojoke

 

[Bob Denman]

They most likely won't use the triple: they'll use the 600cc twin instead. :thumbup:

 

[quasi]

They most likely won't use the triple: they'll use the 600cc twin instead. :thumbup:

and with the proper gearing it'll likely run like a scalded dog!

 

[Bob Denman]

Yup! :thumbup:

 

[spydernatic]

If one looks at what Brp. did in the PWC line with the spark, this is almost a done deal. Affordable ,low power and fun, exactly what a roadster should be.

Exactly what I was thinking if you look at the spark it is a skeleton of their big machines but it is a fun machine and very affordable for anyone wanting get into the Jet ski water fun so I agree BRP will do this.

 

[Tazzel]

I think its a good thing to bring in a low cost model but if it were me I would just offer a private owner 10k to 11k for a 3 year old F3. That's about what dealers offer for trade in of a 3 year old F3 even with low miles.

 

[Bob Denman]

You CAN purchase a used Spyder for that amount...:dontknow:
But BRP is trying to grow their share in the new unit marketplace, and it sounds as if "Project S" will accomplish that! :clap: :2thumbs:

 

[wyliec]

You CAN purchase a used Spyder for that amount...:dontknow:
But BRP is trying to grow their share in the new unit marketplace, and it sounds as if "Project S" will accomplish that! :clap: :2thumbs:

Bob D,

Based on the younger crowd where I workout out, I don't see this going over. Maybe it's because I don't see them hurting for money. On the other hand, maybe if they work at McDonald's, there may be an interest. Where I work and where I workout, I just see quite a few of the younger crowd with disposable income that would not make this of any interest to them.:dontknow:


IMHO, the younger crowd, 20-35 years old (maybe 40), would be more interested in a 2 wheeler.

 

[Bob Denman]

:shocked: In my neck of the woods: the kids aren't that lucky... nojoke
It's about more than the price... Ease of operation, lower maintenance costs, better maneuverability, lighter weight, simpler design...
A "Beginner's bike should be designed will ALL of these factors in mind. :thumbup:

 

[wyliec]

:shocked: In my neck of the woods: the kids aren't that lucky... nojoke
It's about more than the price... Ease of operation, lower maintenance costs, better maneuverability, lighter weight, simpler design...
A "Beginner's bike should be designed will ALL of these factors in mind. :thumbup:

I agree with all that you said. The problem is that of what I would call the typical Spyder rider, and that is one in their 50's and older with various health issues. That doesn't present a good picture to attract the younger crowd. And, before anyone gets their panties in a knot, I'm not saying all have health issues (including hips/knees/shoulders/ankles/prosthetics); what I am saying is that someone who comes on here for the first time will get a dose of health issues on any given day. JMHO

 

[Bob Denman]

There's no doubt that the Reverse Trike design appeals to those of us with a few challenges...
But with some proper marketing: "ease of use" would certainly be a strong selling-point to newbies! :2thumbs:

 

[blacklightning]

This whole $10k spyder thing makes me think of Harley and their 500cc bikes that they have come out with. I was in our local dealership and got a chance to see one up close. For me, I think it would be hard to pay for a new bike like this when I could purchase a nicer, larger displacement one for the same money, but a couple of years old. I think that spyder shoppers will probably be the same way. But I do wish them the best.
I am still believing that the RS and RSS was a better way to get the younger market.

 

[Bob Denman]

That shiny "New Bike Smell", and valuable new bike warranty; is often a nice incentive for a beginner to the sport.:thumbup: