• There were many reasons for the change of the site software, the biggest was security. The age of the old software also meant no server updates for certain programs. There are many benefits to the new software, one of the biggest is the mobile functionality. Ill fix up some stuff in the coming days, we'll also try to get some of the old addons back or the data imported back into the site like the garage. To create a thread or to reply with a post is basically the same as it was in the prior software. The default style of the site is light colored, but i temporarily added a darker colored style, to change you can find a link at the bottom of the site.

Why we like Ys

dogtired

New member
Ok...not a Spyder, but Spyder-like. Costs twice as much, but is it twice as much fun? You get to lean like a single-tracker, but you don't get to feel the high-G sensation of a parallel-tracker when flatassing through the turns. Check out the videos. Would you buy one if it costs the same as a Spyder? I would, but for the same reasons I have more than one bike in my garage....and not instead of. I still like the Spyder for what it is....and this would be a cool diversion. ;)

JV7X9829.jpg

JV7X9696.jpg

B0024P%200027.jpg

http://www.brudelitech.com/product.htm
 
Last edited:
57 views and no comments good or bad? Hmmm. I would think this is a direction BRP could go for those who want a more spirited ride in the Y-config type rigs. Are there no riders here who want to ride like this?

BTW...I'm not a spokeman for the leanster and I don't mean to come across like one...I've never even seen one in person. I'm just a motorsport enthusiast who likes different things in the motorsport world and I thought this design is a great variation of the Y-type configuration. I am curious what the Spyder enthusiasts think. I'm going to guess that 57 of you don't think much of anything about the leanster :yikes:
 
Last edited:
I'd love to give it a test ride. It's kinda squirrely looking. Of course I said both of those things about the Piaggio MP3.
 
57 views and no comments good or bad? Hmmm. I would think this is a direction BRP could go for those who want a more spirited ride in the Y-config type rigs. Are there no riders here who want to ride like this?

BTW...I'm not a spokeman for the leanster and I don't mean to come across like one...I've never even seen one in person. I'm just a motorsport enthusiast who likes different things in the motorsport world and I thought this design is a great variation of the Y-type configuration. I am curious what the Spyder enthusiasts think. I'm going to guess that 57 of you don't think much of anything about the leanster :yikes:

There was a thread about the Leanster back in September '08. It generated some chatter at that time:

http://www.spyderlovers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7117&highlight=leanster

Bruce
 
It's kinda old news around here. I like it and would love to have one. :thumbup:


There was a thread about the Leanster back in September '08. It generated some chatter at that time:

http://www.spyderlovers.com/forums/showthread.php?t=7117&highlight=leanster

Bruce


Yep. This bike has been talked about in at least one or two other threads on here in the past, along with the Harley leaning trike design and a few others. Its still nice that you brought it up so anyone who missed it back then gets to see it.
 
It is a cool concept - I would love to try riding one -- my concern is how the lean angle would consistantly meet the angle you want/need - how would you adjust for weight diffences to keep angle in line etc? I may be overthinking this but....I would hate to be making a gentle turn at a 45 degree angle :yikes:
 
It is a cool concept - I would love to try riding one -- my concern is how the lean angle would consistantly meet the angle you want/need - how would you adjust for weight diffences to keep angle in line etc? I may be overthinking this but....I would hate to be making a gentle turn at a 45 degree angle :yikes:
My guess is that you just ride it like any two-wheeler. It should find its own angle. I had the same questions in my mind about the Piaggio, but once I got on it and got moving, it rode just like any bike. Biggest difference was more stability in low speed turns.
-Scotty
1a_snow.gif
 
My apologies to all....I shoulda' used the search feature :banghead:. That's what I get for being a noobie late for dinner....I miss out on all of the good conversations at the big table :chat:
 
You only need 5 or 6 still pictures to get the idea, not a few dozen as in the link.

On the other hand, a few minutes of some good riding video would go a long way towards making a decision.

Was it an accident that they got it backwards?

I would like to see it over a jump, over rough terrain and climbing hills. You'd think they would have wanted to show more video in varied conditions.

Looks heavy and limited. But I'd like to try it.
 
I thought one of the other posts on this machine had a handful of videos or a link to videos. Some of them showed it running around an ice track I think.
 
Back
Top