I went to the dealer last weekend and was able to compare both of these bikes. Below are a few observations I made.
* The RTL is an absolutely beautiful bike. There are many little tweaks that make the bike feel very upscale. An example is that the rear storage compartments open slowly with a shock absorber. They also close more precise and with less effort.
* you definitely sit lower on the F3L vs the RTL
* The floorboards on the RTL are to die for. They are simply amazing.
* when sitting on the RTL, the windshield, handlebars, and controls all feel closer to you which to me is kind of comforting. I can easily reach the compartment where your cell phone goes. I feel more tucked in behind the windshield.
* when sitting on the F3L, the front feels more stretched out and away from you. I have to lean way forward to reach the cell phone compartment as well as touch the dials.
* from what the sales person told me, there seems to be more technology in the RTL concerning the shock absorbers and automatic leveling.
* The trunks of both bikes felt wonderful and more substantial than previous models. Both have the easy removal mechanisms. LINQ
I still haven’t made up my mind which one I like more. But for me the pros and cons for each bike are listed below.
RTL Pros
* floorboards! I could die on these. Simply amazing. So many ways to stay comfortable.
* luxury feeling
* feel safe and in control behind the windshield and dash
RTL Cons
* higher seating position
* higher price
* worried about how to clean bugs and road debris out of the huge lower side air intakes
F3L Pros
* love the low sitting position
* front end looks more aggressive
* lower cost
F3L Cons
* floorboards just didn’t cut it in spite of ability to move them forward and back
* rear floorboards won’t stay up
* rear side cases harder to close properly
Those are my thoughts. I’m leaning to RTL. How about yours?
* The RTL is an absolutely beautiful bike. There are many little tweaks that make the bike feel very upscale. An example is that the rear storage compartments open slowly with a shock absorber. They also close more precise and with less effort.
* you definitely sit lower on the F3L vs the RTL
* The floorboards on the RTL are to die for. They are simply amazing.
* when sitting on the RTL, the windshield, handlebars, and controls all feel closer to you which to me is kind of comforting. I can easily reach the compartment where your cell phone goes. I feel more tucked in behind the windshield.
* when sitting on the F3L, the front feels more stretched out and away from you. I have to lean way forward to reach the cell phone compartment as well as touch the dials.
* from what the sales person told me, there seems to be more technology in the RTL concerning the shock absorbers and automatic leveling.
* The trunks of both bikes felt wonderful and more substantial than previous models. Both have the easy removal mechanisms. LINQ
I still haven’t made up my mind which one I like more. But for me the pros and cons for each bike are listed below.
RTL Pros
* floorboards! I could die on these. Simply amazing. So many ways to stay comfortable.
* luxury feeling
* feel safe and in control behind the windshield and dash
RTL Cons
* higher seating position
* higher price
* worried about how to clean bugs and road debris out of the huge lower side air intakes
F3L Pros
* love the low sitting position
* front end looks more aggressive
* lower cost
F3L Cons
* floorboards just didn’t cut it in spite of ability to move them forward and back
* rear floorboards won’t stay up
* rear side cases harder to close properly
Those are my thoughts. I’m leaning to RTL. How about yours?