Hi, I was referring to the car ones, they were summer tyres. They were on the car for approximately 20k miles and 2 years before I removed them. I have a picture for you but perhaps you could start a new thread because I feel we're hijacking this one.Are you referring to the Nokians you had on the car, the Spyder, or both? Perhaps the improved performance is due a soft rubber compound. Ya think?
The Nokian tires I bought are a All weather WR G4 with the most asymmetrical tread I have ever seen. We rarely get snow and when we do, it's usually gone in 1 to 3 days. So snow performance wasn't high on the priority list but reviews say they are OK, not great in snow.Hi, I was referring to the car ones, they were summer tyres. They were on the car for approximately 20k miles and 2 years before I removed them. I have a picture for you but perhaps you could start a new thread because I feel we're hijacking this one.
The ones on the Spyder were all season tyres, I covered 7000 miles on them before the bike was sold. I liked their performance a lot but it was too short a time to know about the hardening and aging rubber.
"There are some experts on here that do not agree with Shawn S. Even a casual read on the subject of tires will show that (dare I say 75%...number not vetted), are using car tires. I am also a recent convert."
I would hope the OP perhaps do some reading of at least SOME of the dozens of car tire threads, get an idea of how many people use them and why/what problems have occurred with them then make up his own mind. These "just another tire thread" threads are getting ludicrous. Read, research and decide for yourself!
"There are some experts on here that do not agree with Shawn S. Even a casual read on the subject of tires will show that (dare I say 75%...number not vetted), are using car tires. I am also a recent convert."
I would hope the OP perhaps do some reading of at least SOME of the dozens of car tire threads, get an idea of how many people use them and why/what problems have occurred with them then make up his own mind. These "just another tire thread" threads are getting ludicrous. Read, research and decide for yourself!
I’m sorry you did not read my OP , like most of the people who hijacked my thread , I explained in it if you had actually read it that I am and will use car tires and have been doing so fo the last five years and did a 10,000 mile croscountry 66 day ride this summer on car tires . I don’t feel that my post was “ludicrous” and was simply looking for opinions if anyone had knowledge of car tires affecting the traction control system, again I would say that before adding or hijacking a thread one should read the OP.
Let me start by saying I have around 100 k miles on car tires on my spyders we have owned and have been happy with them, both front and rear. While watching the latest Shawn Smoak video he was doing on the parking break he spotted a car tire on the bike he was working on (happens to be my wife’s bike) that was in for service. His comment was “ oh car tire , danger danger” then he moved on about the adjustment of the parking brake. When I went in to pick the bike up and asked him about the comment his reply was that the car tires affect the traction control system and it’s not as safe. I value Shawns expertise and was wondering what the other “experts out there have to offer” I will most likely stay with car tires as I have had no issues with them. I will add that I sometimes ride very aggressive and have never been spanked by the Nanny.
I did a lot of fretting over tires, finally went on the knowledge that others have been successful in their endeavors. One thing I can't find out is how the Nanny handles the different sizes than OEM. Here's my take on it, based on my previous life as an I&E tech. The computer uses programming to determine if one wheel is stopped or out of spec as far a revolutions (wheel speed sensors). There will be a tolerance because tires wear, rear mores o than front. In selecting my tires, I opted to go with a match that made less of an overall difference in the front/rear rolling ratio. I'm speculating, because I don't know how they programmed the stability computer. If you go with a larger rolling diameter on the rear (I did), try to increase the front rolling diameter the same percentage. It should keep you farther from Nanny intrusion. Just guessing.
FWIW I have to give my Michelin Defender a very low grade for traction. I can hardly ever use high throttle at low speeds in any of the first three gears... it will just spin, spin, spin.
On wet pavement, it behaves like it's icy pavement.
On dry pavement, it behaves like it's wet pavement. (Except maybe on really coarse concrete. I'm talking blacktop, the majority of the roads around here.)
Today a hot little Mustang decided to drag-race me from a stoplight, on blacktop, so I joined the fun. :2thumbs: But I immediately started fishtailing with no traction, and he surged ahead, TEMPORARILY. Of course, when my tire finally grabbed some ass(phalt), I smoked his buns for him. :yes:
But still... I'm looking for better traction on my next CAR tire selection. :dontknow:
Mike, today the tire is 16.5psi (cold). It has ~24,200 miles on it, and the crosswise rain sipes are still prominent.
The DOT number is: DOT APP2 023X 1916 If those last four digits mean Week 19 of Year 2016, then DANG, it was already two years old when I bought it (03/18).
I couldn't find anything like "T&H Model" anywhere on the sidewall. Does that mean Traction & Handling??
On the Order Receipt, I did find this: Michelin Defender 205/60R15 91T BSW If that "91T" is in place of "T&H", perhaps that's the difference? If true, that's my bad, because I found T&H where I wrote down the info from your post, but apparently disregarded it when searching the internet for the tire...
mike: ...you said your tire is at 16.5 psi Now …. what was it normally ????...
I keep this tire at 15-17. About the same in the fronts.
Let me start by saying I have around 100 k miles on car tires on my spyders we have owned and have been happy with them, both front and rear. While watching the latest Shawn Smoak video he was doing on the parking break he spotted a car tire on the bike he was working on (happens to be my wife’s bike) that was in for service. His comment was “ oh car tire , danger danger” then he moved on about the adjustment of the parking brake. When I went in to pick the bike up and asked him about the comment his reply was that the car tires affect the traction control system and it’s not as safe. I value Shawns expertise and was wondering what the other “experts out there have to offer” I will most likely stay with car tires as I have had no issues with them. I will add that I sometimes ride very aggressive and have never been spanked by the Nanny.
There's really no argument here. When the manufacturer states in writing that you must use a specific part that's what you need to use. Kenda is the only manufacturer tested and approved tire specially designed for use on the Spyder. No one can argue with that. It's written in the owners manual. Don't yell at me I didn't write it!
With that said there are thousands and thousands of miles on car tires. You can use whatever you like.