F3 T side cases

[cribby]

i love the new F3T side cases, will they fit on my F3S

Ant?

 

[Tazzel]

no one seems to know much about what will fit and what wont on the 2015.

 

[Retired 2012]

I agree, they are nice looking
I sure hope we don't lose out on these upgrades,
BRP should make them compatible with the current F3S

Would like the newer shock if it fits,

 

[Lamonster]

i love the new F3T side cases, will they fit on my F3S

Ant?

It would not be cost effective to make them work. You have to change the whole backend.

 

[lazor1]

i noticed the rear end change also, so might go with corbin.

It would not be cost effective to make them work. You have to change the whole backend.

 

[Lamonster]

That's what my wife and I have now. Love the Corbin bags

 

[Sccar]

Lamonster,
what windshiled is on your F3.

 

[Lamonster]

Lamonster,
what windshiled is on your F3.

I have the 129

 

[SpyderAnn01]

Are the F3-T bags removable?

 

[vdoman]

Those bags

easy as and detachable as the 2015 models bags?

 

[Lamonster]

Are the F3-T bags removable?

No, built in like the RT

easy as and detachable as the 2015 models bags?

The Corbin bags are helt on by three bolts and are not meant to be removed to carry into your room. They do come off easy for working on the bike.

 

[Tazzel]

I am glad they did not discontinue the F3-S because I just could not ride around with that big Ass on the F3-T and F3 Limited. The fact that you can detach the saddlebags on the F3-S is a big seller for me. You dont need all that storage unless you are going on long trips and for many of us that is about 5% or less of the time. Its nice you can remove the saddlebags when not needed. If I was touring a lot I would get a RT.

 

[MMMII]

It doesn't look like they are much bigger then the 2015 bags either. True or False?

 

[Lamonster]

It doesn't look like they are much bigger then the 2015 bags either. True or False?

They are about 78 liters or 20 gals. About the same.

 

[blacklightning]

I must admit, I was not a fan of the F3 in 2015, but with the addition of the bags on the 2016 model, or even by adding the corbin bags, it is starting to grow on me. I still think I would be upset about giving up my spacious frunk, but the addition of the bags makes it more manageable.
But, for my wife's sake, I will need to stick with my RT in order for her to enjoy a ride with me.
On another note, the 2016 F3 with the bags, makes me think of the Goldwing F6B, which I like a lot.

 

[JkRbbt]

Liking my 2015 with the possibility of the Corbin bags better all the time! YMMV!

 

[Lamonster]

I must admit, I was not a fan of the F3 in 2015, but with the addition of the bags on the 2016 model, or even by adding the corbin bags, it is starting to grow on me. I still think I would be upset about giving up my spacious frunk, but the addition of the bags makes it more manageable.
But, for my wife's sake, I will need to stick with my RT in order for her to enjoy a ride with me.
On another note, the 2016 F3 with the bags, makes me think of the Goldwing F6B, which I like a lot.

I agree, I loved my F6B and the bags were about the same size inside.

 

[stebrock]

2015 accessory catalog states that the bags are 13 gallons/50 liters so about 50% (usable?) greater capacity for the new ones. The 2016's are 70 liters and the Corbins are 68 liters. Corbin make these for BRP?

 

[Lamonster]

2015 accessory catalog states that the bags are 13 gallons/50 liters so about 50% (usable?) greater capacity for the new ones. The 2016's are 70 liters and the Corbins are 68 liters. Corbin make these for BRP?

My mistake on the size of the bags. Total storage is 78L or 21 gal.

 

[Retired 2012]

That state total vehicle storage, which includes the fruck correct???